, if at all, and how do
we know if they are there now?
I'm not a big supporter of imports, but if you are going to use them, you
should use and verify all of them, not just some bits. I'm not sure if
there is a key/tag for unverified, but it might be worth looking at.
Gerald
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Sam Vekemans
acrosscanadatra...@gmail.comwrote:
Lol, that page is no longer valid.
Well, the statement on it seems pretty unequivocal -- [PD data release ...]
I grant anyone the right to use my contributions *for any purpose*, without
any conditions, unless
to koordinates.com and perhaps
geocommons.com) as well as making .osm files and garmin map files :)
Thanks,
Sam
--
Gerald
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
the copyright is willing to
let the freedoms apply to their material.
Thanks,
Gerald
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
are effectively swapped. We are glad you informed us of this
discrepancy and the information as been transmit to the person in
charge. We will advise you once the problem is fixed.
--
Gerald
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http
a lot. It was a big and easy to
see change, and people get to point and say, I mapped that.
I'm not sure with the Geobase import this is as much an issue anymore, but
once the roads were in there was lots of time to add details like type of
road and name on the very cold days.
Gerald
want, then you are free to help improve
it. But improving != removing and re-importing.
Or, if you can wait, I'm sure someone will improve it.
Gerald
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
grandfather the unknown data out.
I'm not sure if this would pass muster on the legal side, for IANAL... but
it's a comprehensive approach to the possibly tainted data.
Thanks,
Gerald.
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http
8 matches
Mail list logo
