Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 18:11 -0500, Kate Chapman wrote:
>> What's wrong with doing automated addressing imports in situations
>> where we have point level address data?
>
> The issue is that it may not line up with the roads at all. We also
> need to ensure that we *find* the
For a single county or jurisdiction, if you delete the TIGER data and
import more accurate local data, what do you do at the boundaries?
County/Stare data sets I've seen usually get cut off +/- a few hundred
feet (if that) from the boundary. Does somebody go through and make
them fit/connect
Dan,
Alexandria gave us permission to import their data but still wanted
the 100 dollar CD fee. Someone paid that and we do have the data.
As far as I know nobody has asked Fairfax County, but I figured making
D.C. look nice with a combination of mapping and importing would be a
strong tool
On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 18:54 -0500, Anthony wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 18:11 -0500, Kate Chapman wrote:
> >> What's wrong with doing automated addressing imports in situations
> >> where we have point level address data?
> >
> > The issue
Hi Kate,
Sounds good. My guess is that the data from the District is based on the
assessor parcels. Given what you said (I'm assuming you are in the
Northern VA suburbs of DC), have you looked into whether Fairfax County
or Alexandria has released their parcel or centerline road data?
Dan
On Sun
Hi Dan,
Both manual and donated data. I've been addressing my neighborhood in
Virginia but Washington D.C. donated point level addresses.
Kate Chapman
On Nov 15, 2009, at 6:37 PM, Dan Putler
wrote:
> Hi Kate,
>
> How have the address points been obtained? From OSM users? The Census
> Bure
Hi Kate,
How have the address points been obtained? From OSM users? The Census
Bureau has collected and created a national data set of them in
preparation for the 2010 Census, but for non-disclosure reasons, they
have no intention of releasing them to the public. The next possible
public source of
On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 18:28 -0500, Kate Chapman wrote:
> Maybe I'm confused about the address versus road information. I would
> think the address point would be the front door of the building and
> would not be a relation to the road. So the node of the address and
> the way of the road would no
Dave,
Understood, I would envision it being a partially manual and partially
automated process.
Maybe I'm confused about the address versus road information. I would think
the address point would be the front door of the building and would not be a
relation to the road. So the node of the addre
Kate,
Nothing at all. The thing is that in many instances the road vectors,
and the address ranges, may well be more accurate in data from the
county than from TIGER data. The Census Bureau has done some things to
clean up what there road vectors, but for some counties I've looked at,
there is sti
On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 18:11 -0500, Kate Chapman wrote:
> What's wrong with doing automated addressing imports in situations
> where we have point level address data?
The issue is that it may not line up with the roads at all. We also
need to ensure that we *find* the roads to which it refers to e
Dan,
What's wrong with doing automated addressing imports in situations where we
have point level address data? Or are you just referring to not importing
the addressing that is available for the Tiger data?
Kate Chapman
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-11-1
12 matches
Mail list logo
