>
It didn't seem to stop every single municipal and provincial government
wanting to tweak the wording a bit, which makes it a different licence
every time.
The TB licence is fairly new. As far as I am aware only Ottawa has adopted
it so far.
Cheerio John
On 3 Mar 2018 2:16 pm, "Stewart C. Russ
On 2018-03-03 11:59 AM, john whelan wrote:
>
> I assume you're not Canadian.
Umm, Steve is one of the longest-standing Canadian OSM contributors. I
think he's the admin of talk-ca too …
> All data released through
> their Open Data portal is under their licence which has been approved by
> the L
> Whenever I've spoken[1] to government representative about choosing an
OSM compatible license I tell them to choose between PDDL and CC0. Use one
of these two licenses as written, don't make any changes to them. These are
the two licenses listed as fully compatible with both the CT and ODBL
https
On Sat, 3 Mar 2018, john whelan wrote:
> This brings me to the conclusion after all these discussions something
similar to what SteveA-2009 mentioned.
Instead of having OSM conform to these licenses, would be be able to get the
governing bodies to conform to OSM?
In many cases, I'm working wit
> This brings me to the conclusion after all these discussions something
similar to what SteveA-2009 mentioned. Instead of having OSM conform to
these licenses, would be be able to get the governing bodies to conform to
OSM? In many cases, I'm working with my colleges in the GIS community to
borrow
5 matches
Mail list logo
