Piórkowski [mailto:ja...@piorkowski.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 17:19
To: Begin Daniel; talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] FW: Building Import
Hi Daniel,
If you are interested, some more potentially complicated areas around
Golden Horseshoe for testing. Each is roughly one
Piórkowski [mailto:ja...@piorkowski.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 17:19
To: Begin Daniel; talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] FW: Building Import
Hi Daniel,
If you are interested, some more potentially complicated areas around
Golden Horseshoe for testing. Each is roughly one
As usual, missed the reply all …
From: jfd...@hotmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 16:26
To: 'John Whelan'
Subject: RE: [Talk-ca] Building Import
It is really kind to consider my background ;-)
You are right regarding the "black box" approach; this is why a large approval
from the
I like the idea of building a consensus on a building import.
More seriously if we can get any sort of consensus I'll be more than happy.
Cheerio John
Begin Daniel wrote on 2019-03-21 2:40 PM:
Oups, I still miss the “reply all” button
*From:*jfd...@hotmail.com
*Sent:* Thursday, March
Oups, I still miss the "reply all" button
From: jfd...@hotmail.com
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 14:36
To: 'Nate Wessel'
Subject: RE: [Talk-ca] Building Import
Hi all,
Concerning the pre-processing, let's try/check first the "orthogonalization"
component then, if there is a consensus on
5 matches
Mail list logo