Couldn't you just tag your tracks with accuracy=1m etc?
Russell
On 2010-07-07, at 8:36 AM, "si...@mungewell.org" wrote:
>
>> I will be interested to see what all people have to say about this. :)
>>
>> I for one wish I could get access to some survey-grade GPS equipment. But
>> its just so dar
> I will be interested to see what all people have to say about this. :)
>
> I for one wish I could get access to some survey-grade GPS equipment. But
> its just so darn expensive.
Even with expensive equipment the 'tracks' can still be somewhat dubious.
The biggest problem OSM has is that there
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Regie Alam wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> My name is Regie Alam, from Ottawa. This is my first post on the list
> although I've been receiving the messages for quite some time now.
>
> I am just wondering if there is an accepted protocol for ground truthing
> the dat
Hi all,
I'd actually recommend having a meet-up for the Ottawa area mappers.
I have cc'd the Ottawa OSGeo Local chapter list.
So then those who already have experience working with the data can
share with others the methods.
I'm in Victoria, BC so i cant pick a day/time to host it :)
But for tho
Hello,
My name is Regie Alam, from Ottawa. This is my first post on the list although I've been receiving the messages for quite some time now.
I am just wondering if there is an accepted protocol for ground truthing the data (Canvec, etc.)? I would find it interesting doing some ground t
5 matches
Mail list logo
