: RE: [Talk-ca] Highway 400A
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 21:43:03 -0400
You could always add the '400A' part to the 'unsigned_ref' tag because of it
being mentioned in the traffic volume documents.
-James
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:14:52 -0700
From: berniejconn...@gmail.com
To: andersontris
The smartest thing to do is tag it based on the highway signs along the road.
Bernie.
—
Bernie Connors
New Maryland, NB
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 11:42 PM, Kevin Farrugia kevinfarru...@gmail.com
wrote:
There's some conflicting stuff about this when I look into it: the last
traffic
If the highway signs match the ORN data I would completely ignore any contrary
information. I know the province is actively maintaining and updating the ORN
data.
Bernie.
—
Bernie Connors
New Maryland, NB
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Tristan Anderson
andersontris...@hotmail.com
You could always add the '400A' part to the 'unsigned_ref' tag because of it
being mentioned in the traffic volume documents.
-James
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:14:52 -0700
From: berniejconn...@gmail.com
To: andersontris...@hotmail.com
CC: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Highway
There's some conflicting stuff about this when I look into it: the last
traffic volume report (2010) from MTO refers to the section as 400A (
http://www.ontario.ca/data/traffic-volume), but MNR road data labels it as
Highway 11 (the MNR Ontario Road Network dataset is the source for GeoBase
roads
The south end of Highway 11 at the Highway 11/400 junction between
Highway 400 and Penetanguishene Road, just north of Barrie is
currently tagged as Highway 400A in OSM. Is this still Highway 400A? I
thought that this became Highway 11 after the Mike Harris downloading
downloaded the section of
6 matches
Mail list logo