ms so obvious for you :-)
Best,
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Richard Weait [mailto:rich...@weait.com]
Sent: January-06-14 12:49
To: Pierre Béland
Cc: diane.merc...@gmail.com; Talk- CA Open Street Map
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] OSM New-York - Import de contours de batiments et
adresses
O
cuss of imports.
>
> Let's hope that we can have more constructive ways to discuss on this
> list in 2014.
>
>
> Pierre
>
> --
> *De :* Richard Weait
> *À :* Pierre Béland
> *Cc :* Talk- CA Open Street Map ; "
> diane.
ys to discuss on this list in
2014.
Pierre
De : Richard Weait
À : Pierre Béland
Cc : Talk- CA Open Street Map ;
"diane.merc...@gmail.com"
Envoyé le : Lundi 6 janvier 2014 12h49
Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] OSM New-York - Import de contours de batime
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Pierre Béland wrote:
> Richard
>
> I dont think that we should advocate against import.
Then we differ.
I've been advocating for "better imports" with every import I've seen
since 2006. While the tools have improved, the results for the most
part, just haven't.
I would point to the NYC building import as another example of how
imports can go badly, and be damaging for OpenStreetMap. To be
beneficial, any import must be handled with extreme care. NYC has not
done that. You'll have to read a very long thread to understand what
is going on, from those who
Bonne année à tous,
Je découvre cette note parlant de OSM-US et de l'import du bati et des adresses
de New-York.
https://www.mapbox.com/blog/nyc-and-openstreetmap-cooperating-through-open-data/
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lxbarth/diary/20418
Voici une zone où l'import a été effectué. Ce
6 matches
Mail list logo