>
> I think you have everything tagged properly. A possible change would
> be playground --> pitch, but the rendering challenge remains. That
> makes this a "rendering problem for a specific use case" I think.
> Without broad support, whatever the rendering solution, it is less
> likely to be a
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Yves Moisan wrote:
>
>>
>> Somebody is doing some nice mapping around Sherbrooke!
> :-)
>>
>> I like the current rendering of the multi-use fields. I understood
>> the combinations immediately.
>>
>> The current fields are tagged as
>> leisure=playground
>> sport=s
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 09:49:51AM -0400, Yves Moisan wrote:
> Right on. I need a compelling rendering. If I could get that, I could
> use OSM as the official soccer club map because it would be both a nice
> map when zoomed out (hopefully one day we can get a "hybrid" with
> OpenAerialMap for a
>
> Somebody is doing some nice mapping around Sherbrooke!
:-)
>
> I like the current rendering of the multi-use fields. I understood
> the combinations immediately.
>
> The current fields are tagged as
> leisure=playground
> sport=soccer
>
> I've seen others use
> leisure=pitch
> sport=socce
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Yves Moisan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've set up a wiki page last night to discuss a way to avoid "mapping
> for the renderer" for a specific item : soccer fields :
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/soccer_field. In
> the page, I refer to a specifi
Hi All,
I've set up a wiki page last night to discuss a way to avoid "mapping
for the renderer" for a specific item : soccer fields :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/soccer_field. In
the page, I refer to a specific mapping issue I've come across.
Comments welcome.
Yves
_
6 matches
Mail list logo
