My personal view is if we have a process that follows the rules
available then at least there is more chance they will be followed and
edits will not be reversed.
I might note the buildings in Regina have amazing similar outlines to
the ones made available via the Stats Canada file but I
On Nov 5, 2018, at 7:29 AM, keith hartley wrote:
> I saw it was a great job. But you're correct, I have no documentation on how
> they did it. Licence process, wiki ( I feel Steve already yelling at his
> computer)
If you mean me, I'm saddened to hear that others think I "yell." Rather, my
I saw it was a great job. But you're correct, I have no documentation on
how they did it. Licence process, wiki ( I feel Steve already yelling at
his computer)
On Nov 5, 2018 9:24 AM, "john whelan" wrote:
>Someone already did Regina!
and that is an issue and why we need to get this lot
>Someone already did Regina!
and that is an issue and why we need to get this lot formalised quickly
before someone starts talking about imports being done without the correct
license.
Cheerio John
On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 10:15, keith hartley
wrote:
> Someone already did Regina!
>
> On Mon, Nov
Someone already did Regina!
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018, 9:06 AM James Saskatchewan has Regina data. That's it.
>
> It's totally dependent on cities contributing to the open data effort
>
> On Mon., Nov. 5, 2018, 9:21 a.m. keith hartley wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> I'd love to do more imports - I have a
Saskatchewan has Regina data. That's it.
It's totally dependent on cities contributing to the open data effort
On Mon., Nov. 5, 2018, 9:21 a.m. keith hartley Hi all,
> I'd love to do more imports - I have a group here that we get together to
> do mapping as well as know some locals. Of course
Hi all,
I'd love to do more imports - I have a group here that we get together to
do mapping as well as know some locals. Of course we'd add a wiki to the MB
page to show the project ect. From what I can tell there's no stats can
data for manitoba or sask though!
Keith
7 matches
Mail list logo
