Thanks,I do think that "TBD" (to be determined) would be better than 'n/a'
... so 'TBD in OSM". As what i was doing was simply guessing at what it
'could be'. So for those items that are still TBD, i should note them.
Cool, i wont touch that chart until your done. As there's still lots of
fix
Hi Sam,
I am not done yet with the chart.
I've checked with my co-workers about the "In geobase" statement of canvec
features. It means that the same feature exist in a geobase product (in this
case the NHN). I think we should first use the features in canvec. Later we
could check what w
P.S. Im now fixing up the rules.txt file. The changes should be made
available for canvec2osm v0.06 Thanks again for the edits :-)
Sam
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
Hi thanks for all the edits :)
1 - I like the new table edit, where 3 lines are merges into 1 ... that
makes sence ... and saves in space making the chart smaller. ...
When i go through the other charts again, i'll be fixing that.
2 - I saw you indicated that more of the Features are listed in NHN
4 matches
Mail list logo
