Thanks, Because of the extra tagging and rendering requirements for address-range, the canvec2osm script im working on will not include this data. (even for other provinces where it is available)
However, its still on my plate to deal with, so if anyone wants to tackle it, i have ideas. The tags and roads which they lie on will be available in the 'extra' folder, but only as a 'draft' form. I have a GoogleDocs Spreadsheet -showing all canvec=osm tags (better than what i first did, thanks CanVec) available for peer review and editing. I'll put a link to it on the CanVec wiki page later. Cheers, Sam On 7/6/09, Bergeron, Guy <guy.berge...@rncan-nrcan.gc.ca> wrote: > Sorry for the late reply, I was away on holiday. > > The next Canvec release is scheduled for this Fall (around October). > > The address ranges information is part of Canvec. > > > Guy > > -----Original Message----- > From: samvekem...@gmail.com [mailto:samvekem...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of > Sam Vekemans > Sent: 20 juin 2009 17:46 > To: Bergeron, Guy > Cc: Adam Glauser; talk-ca@openstreetmap.org; Steve Singer > Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Ontario 040P > > Would you know when it will be available in the CanVec data? > > Has anyone thought of how we can make use of the geobase address range > data? > Does anyone want an .osm file to be made that just has the 4 address > range fields (and the proper source tags) made as i go through with > canvec2osm? > > Cheers, > Sam > > > On 6/18/09, Bergeron, Guy <guy.berge...@rncan-nrcan.gc.ca> wrote: >> Just a heads up that the next NRN release for Ontario, schedule for > this >> summer (around August), will include street names and address ranges >> from closest to source NRN providers. >> >> Guy >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: talk-ca-boun...@openstreetmap.org >> [mailto:talk-ca-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Adam Glauser >> Sent: 16 juin 2009 13:10 >> To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org >> Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Ontario 040P >> >> I've found (and since corrected) a couple more false-positive matches. >> >> Ways 35518380 was name="Old Oak Place", statscan:rbuid=3357619. These >> tags should actually have been applied to way 35521248. The correct >> tags for the first way are name="Aspenwood Place", >> statscan:rbuid=3357613. >> >> Way 35502496 was name="Willow Wood Drive",statscan:rbuid=3357623. >> Should be name="Woodrow Place",statscan:rbuid=3357623. This is tricky >> in part due to one Statscan feature corresponding to two different >> Geobase features (the entrance to the cul-de-sac and the >> circle-with-middle-barrier part). >> >> I'll continue to report these unless I hear otherwise - I'm still new >> here, if this is just noise please let me know. >> >> Also, thanks to Steve's pointers about OpenJUMP and the StatsCan road >> name data, I've given names to a bunch of ways that Roadmatcher > couldn't >> >> resolve, along with their StatsCan RB_UIDs, using a combination of the >> .shp file from the StatsCan website and local knowledge of the layout > of >> >> the roads. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-ca mailing list >> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-ca mailing list >> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >> > > > -- > Twitter: @Acrosscanada > Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sam.vekemans > -- Twitter: @Acrosscanada Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sam.vekemans _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
