Yes I see it too at the higher zoom levels in the Fredericton area.
--
Bernie Connors, P.Eng
Service New Brunswick
(506) 444-2077
45°56'25.21N, 66°38'53.65W
www.snb.ca/geonb/http://www.snb.ca/geonb/
From: Steven Brown [mailto:b27...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 2011-06-03 22:56
To:
Dear John,
Your edit today http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8355694
deleted thousands of nodes and ways, with a comment of bixi
bike_rental but in fact deleted large portions of Leslie park.
Acting on your advice I accepted the new CT. On looking more deeply into
the subject I note that I have retrospectively allowed OSM to license
anything I have ever added to the map in any way they wish. Currently it is
odbl but the CT allows anything, the license seems to be an ever changing
1. deleting the data for the reasons you've stated with the comment
bicycle_rental bixi is anti-social and deceptive. At least put a comment in
saying what your doing.
2. People should NOT be pre-maturely deleting their own non ct-terms data from
the map. Some day in the future OSM will
It's not up to John to determine, privately and unilaterally, what is
and isn't acceptable vis-à-vis CanVec and OSM. If he has a legitimate
concern, he should bring that concern to the attention of the OSM
community and have it thoroughly discussed -- and, you know, maybe
WARN US that he's going
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 4:17 PM, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote:
Acting on your advice I accepted the new CT.
If I recall discussion you asked what the license was all about and
why was there so much chatter about it? And if I recall my reply, it
was something along the lines of, you
Revert, revert, revert.
You can't decide, once the house is built, that you're taking back the
bricks you contributed to it.
Reimporting CanVec atop existing edits would cause all sorts of
trouble. The remaining, undeleted edits would be superimposed. I would
have thought John would know that by
No at the time the data was added there wasn't a problem. The problem arose
when the new CT retroactively changed the previously inserted data.
Cheerio John
On 6 June 2011 18:30, Gordon Dewis gor...@pinetree.org wrote:
What should John do?
John should accept the fact that the data he has
Well, not sure what to say, John. You've deleted stuff that I've worked on
without my consent, so there's a problem. If the features you had deleted
were still v1 that you had added, I could see an argument in support of what
you've done, but many of the features appear to be v1 with more than
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 6:10 PM, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote:
According to the new CT terms OSM can change the license to anything.
Dear John,
Your interpretation of the contributor terms is incorrect. See §3
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Contributor_Terms
... or such
10 matches
Mail list logo
