Re: [Talk-ca] Building Footprint Upload to OSM

Thanks for your help John, Is this the license we should be looking at adopting: https://open.canada.ca/en/open-government-licence-canada? Rob From: john whelan [mailto:jwhelan0...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2018 9:22 PM To: Rob Halko Cc:

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Footprint Upload to OSM

That one says federal government. Somewhere they have a kit with the municipal version and that's the one you want. Exact license is the one the City of Ottawa uses just sub "City of Ottawa" with your city name. Note to Tracey and or Kent could you be very nice and point Rob to the exact

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Footprint Upload to OSM

Rob, One other thing to think about while others are discussing the licensing topic:  What is the quality of the buildings?  Has that been reviewed? * Are they in the right place? * Are they the right size? * Are they squared off (rectangles) * Are they aligned to each other and the road

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Footprint Upload to OSM

On 2018-03-07 09:08 PM, Steve Singer wrote: > > It is my understanding that the act of substitution is enough of a > change to require the LWG to need to look at it. That's correct, Steve. I clarified the Ottawa import page a little: > The OSMF Licensing Working Group determined in their

Re: [Talk-ca] Emergency Request for Tasking Manager Trainer

[prune CC list so this gets posted to the list] Hi Jonathan, I'm probably missing something, but you don't link training videos from the tasking manager.   The tasking manager is about splitting up some pre-defined mapping jobs (eg trace outline of building from bing satellite image), into

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Footprint Upload to OSM

On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, john whelan wrote: That one says federal government.  Somewhere they have a kit with the municipal version and that's the one you want.  Exact license is the one the City of Ottawa uses just sub "City of Ottawa" with your city name. Note to Tracey and or Kent could you be