On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 at 11:45, john whelan wrote:
> ...
> About that time an American mapper, Nate, who was living in Toronto ...
Sorry, one more thing.
Nate was an active editor in Toronto at the time of the initial import
conflict/objection and has remained so as regularly as we can ask of
any
Both your input and Nate's are useful in that at least they confirm my thoughts
that there is little chance of moving forward on a Canada wide basis.
Hopefully the Toronto mappers can sort something out for Toronto and the rest
will follow in time.
As a Toronto mapper, I'm happy to load
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 at 20:43, John Whelan wrote:
> The Stat Can data comes directly from the municipalities so each municipality
> will have a different quality of data. The Microsoft and NR Can data maybe
> more consistent.
Statcan could improve the data and make it more consistent. On this
The Stat Can data comes directly from the municipalities so each
municipality will have a different quality of data. The Microsoft and
NR Can data maybe more consistent.
Both your input and Nate's are useful in that at least they confirm my
thoughts that there is little chance of moving
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 at 11:45, john whelan wrote:
> I do know that a number of departments and agencies would like to use
> buildings and although they can use the open data sources using OSM would be
> more convenient.
Then you can encourage these agencies to urge Statcan to improve the
I'll try to sum up my understanding.
Currently your view is the existing import plan for Canada building
imports does not meet the import guidelines and cannot be amended to
meet them. I was hoping that something might have happened in the last
six months on the preprocessing of data side
John,
You are once again purposely mischaracterizing my position on this and I
do not appreciate it one bit. Your import did not follow the import
guidelines and was not approved by the broader community. It was not
sent out to the mailing list, it was barely documented, it was not
posted on
>From memory we have imported Ottawa's buildings under the correct license
(Stat Can so the federal government's open data license) and the quality
was deemed acceptable by the local mappers.
Then we opened up a second import plan to import buildings and a fair
number were imported. This
Bonjour John,
De mon côté je n'ai pas encore complété le travail pour réaliser une fonction
PostGIS pour orthogonaliser les bâtiments.
Voici cependant une solution possible pour corrger les angles à partir de JOSM
pour les bâtiments déja importés tel que décrit dans le ticket JOSM
9 matches
Mail list logo
