Re: [Talk-ca] Annexation/amalgamation of towns/villages in Canada

2016-09-02 Thread Stewart C. Russell
On 2016-09-02 12:02 PM, yegbin wrote: > > As Beverly no longer exists, is it best practice to delete this node or is > there a better way to tag it? It shouldn't be in the map if it can't be verified on the ground. As to tagging, please delete the gns:* tags and especially the is_in tag. That

Re: [Talk-ca] Annexation/amalgamation of towns/villages in Canada

2016-09-02 Thread James
You can use the disused tag http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused: If you really dont want to delete it On Sep 2, 2016 12:03 PM, "yegbin" wrote: > Hi all. > > First post from a new contributor so initially want to say I am enjoying > being a part of this OSM

[Talk-ca] Annexation/amalgamation of towns/villages in Canada

2016-09-02 Thread yegbin
Hi all. First post from a new contributor so initially want to say I am enjoying being a part of this OSM Canadian community. I would like some local opinions on Beverly. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/51970574 The former town of Beverly was amalgamated into Edmonton in 1961