On 8/11/2016 5:53 AM, Kevin Farrugia wrote:
Yes - recently bootprint, andrewpmk, and I have been changing and
correcting the name tags to destination in Ontario along the
400-Series highways. If you see a ramp/link that is named, it's fine
to change it over to destination or correct a problem
I dont see why not if we are making the map follow the standards, any
misstagging should probably be corrected
On Aug 16, 2016 5:21 AM, "Manohar Erikipati" wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Thank you Harald, James and Kevin for your replies. We currently follow the
> proposed
Hi everyone,
Thank you Harald, James and Kevin for your replies. We currently
follow the proposed mapping methods in the Wiki [1] James had
mentioned. We have observed that there are name tags given for
junction nodes[2] in which destinations were given. Is this a
previously agreed tagging method
Yes - recently bootprint, andrewpmk, and I have been changing and
correcting the name tags to destination in Ontario along the 400-Series
highways. If you see a ramp/link that is named, it's fine to change it over
to destination or correct a problem you find with it.
On Aug 11, 2016 8:38 AM,
I think this wiki article covers how exits should be mapped:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Exit_Info
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Harald Kliems wrote:
> Hi Manohar:
> It is my understanding that including destinations in the name is an
> artifact of people tagging for
Hi Manohar:
It is my understanding that including destinations in the name is an
artifact of people tagging for the renderer (and/or tagging destinations at
a time before there was an established tagging scheme). If you search
through the talk-ca archives, you should be able to find some
Hello everyone!
Turn restriction sprint was met with an amazing response! We loved working
with you all on adding turn-restrictions in Canada. We appreciate the
timely help and suggestions we got which helped us add correct restrictions
and to also maintain the quality of data we were adding on
7 matches
Mail list logo