Sorry for the English interruption!
Maybe someone on this list could help me with this:
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/955
cheers
Richard
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
Thanks all for the offers of help! Really encouraging.
I'll spend a bit of time bringing the text together and will create a
wiki page for it. We can then maintain the translations through svn.
More soon, hopefully.
cheers
Richard
___
Talk-de mail
Apologies, as a non-German speaker I can only half-follow this
discussion through Google Translate, and I realise it's very rude to
post in English on a German-speaking list. I thought it would
nonetheless be valuable to follow up two points in particular, hope
you don't mind.
Andre Rech
Ralf Otmanns wrote:
> Potlatch mag sein ein tolles Tool sein, ein gut gemeintes Tool ...
> leider wissen vielleicht 2 % der Leute, die es verwenden, was sie da
> tun. Ihr wisst ja, dass "gut gemeint" das Gegentum zu "gut" ist. Der
> Rest sind wie 4jährige, denen Du Malstifte gibst und sie da
Henry Loenwind wrote:
> So again it boils down to "we don't want any teamwork, we only want
> people who randomly implement stuff on their own" and "if you want
> to talk about some aspect of OSM, you are not wanted here".
No, it doesn't. Talking is great (like I say, especially if you talk
Hello all,
Please excuse me writing in English - very impolite on a -de list I
know, but sadly I don't speak German and have had to follow the
discussion through Google Translation. Sorry.
Could I please reiterate:
- Potlatch will have a history/revert option shortly after API 0.5
goes liv
(Sorry, tried to send this yesterday but my subscription to talk-de
appeared to have died! Apologies in advance for posting in English.)
Tirkon's claim about Potlatch and relation handling is complete nonsense.
To edit a relation in Potlatch 2:
* select a node or way which is a member of that rel
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> So in the end I am happy that someone recently coded the
> missing relation support for Potlatch2, but given your
> statements from previous discussions (as well as you closing
> relative tickets with "won't fix") wasn't really encouraging to
> think that this has b
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Btw: I am not aware of the concept of "parasitical criticism", what do
> you intent? -> reply offlist preferred to keep the noise low
Replied offlist.
Richard
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists
Stephan Knauss wrote:
> Das ist egal. Die Bilder sind sauber. Potlach hat aus irgendwelchen
> Gründen beschlossen diese Bereiche zu verschleiern.
You are certifiably insane.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Potlach-2-kein-bing-Hintergrund-Bild-me
10 matches
Mail list logo
