"Richard Fairhurst" wrote:
>Tirkon, I
>would be grateful if you would stop repeating the claim that there is no
>support.
Hi Richard,
The last time I used Potlatch, it did not work. So I changed to JOSM.
Because I did not know this for sure I brought this question up at the
discussion page of
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Btw: I am not aware of the concept of "parasitical criticism", what do
> you intent? -> reply offlist preferred to keep the noise low
Replied offlist.
Richard
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists
2011/12/13 Richard Fairhurst :
> But I realise that would require you to actually do some work rather than
> just endlessly, parasitically criticising others' work on the mailing lists.
I do not think you have necessarily to be able to code Flash and
improve Potlatch to be allowed to criticize it
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> So in the end I am happy that someone recently coded the
> missing relation support for Potlatch2, but given your
> statements from previous discussions (as well as you closing
> relative tickets with "won't fix") wasn't really encouraging to
> think that this has b
2011/12/13 Richard Fairhurst :
> So there you go, full support for nested and ordered relations.
happy to see this (actually I discovered it myself just a few hours ago).
> Martin, I've long since stopped expecting anything you say to be
> founded in any form of reality.
LOL, that's a good on
(Sorry, tried to send this yesterday but my subscription to talk-de
appeared to have died! Apologies in advance for posting in English.)
Tirkon's claim about Potlatch and relation handling is complete nonsense.
To edit a relation in Potlatch 2:
* select a node or way which is a member of that rel
6 matches
Mail list logo
