The C classification is just not available on the ground, and
is in
practice only of use to highway engineers.
This interpretation is subjective to some extent, but more
useful IMO
(and leads to prettier maps :-))
I notice that some of the tertiary grid roads in MK have had what
was
On 18/05/09 11:06, Andy Allan wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
ajrli...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm expecting to organise another 6 parties through the rest of this year so
people's preference for locations please shout up again.
Scotland! I
Ed Loach wrote:
I notice that some of the tertiary grid roads in MK have had what
was tagged in the loc_ref field added to the ref field (such as H4).
I think this looks good in Mapnik and wonder whether we should
extend it to the other tertiary grid roads (as the primary and
secondary ones
http://www.cbrd.co.uk/c-roads/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
http://www.cbrd.co.uk/c-roads/
But is this not confusing highway=tertiary with C roads? A bit like
the confusion that arises between using highway=trunk for the
green/yellow A roads in the UK rather than the trunk network as
maintained by the highways agency. The tag value is perhaps a bit
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 10:27:15 +0100
From: Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk
Message-ID: 000601c9d864$0393d900$0abb8b...@me.uk
I notice that some of the tertiary grid roads in MK have had what
was tagged in the loc_ref field added to the ref field (such as H4).
I think this looks good in Mapnik and
Lundy Island, in the Bristol Channel, is pretty much compelte. The island has
no proper roads to speak of and only tracks. All buildings have been added
along
with the prominent walls that cross the island: the quarter way, half way and
three-quarter way walls. In addition the three
7 matches
Mail list logo
