- Original Message -
From: "Dave F."
To:
Sent: Sunday, December 26, 2010 1:42 PM
Subject: [Talk-GB] Street name disagreement - whose right or wrong?
Hi
I have a street in my area whose name is being contest by another mapper.
To prevent it reducing to a tit-for-tat retaliations
On Sun, 26 Dec 2010, Dave F. wrote:
> I have a street in my area whose name is being contest by another
> mapper. To prevent it reducing to a tit-for-tat retaliations I'd
> thought it best to get it adjudicated here.
>
> I think it's X because it signed on the ground & in OS Locator as such.
>
As others have said, I use whatever is actually on the roadsign above
anything else, even if a variety of other resources disagree. Reason? I use
the maps for a sat nav, and actual real-world road names are far more
useful...
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 2:19 PM, David Earl wrote:
> On Sunday, 26 Dece
On Sunday, 26 December 2010, Richard wrote:
> My personal opinion is that "Signed on the ground" should always take
> precedence.
+1
But you can always use alt_ name where there is another variant (or
even completely different name).
David
___
Talk-
On Sunday 26 December 2010 13:42:47 Dave F. wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a street in my area whose name is being contest by another
> mapper. To prevent it reducing to a tit-for-tat retaliations I'd thought
> it best to get it adjudicated here.
>
> I think it's X because it signed on the ground & in OS
Hi
I have a street in my area whose name is being contest by another
mapper. To prevent it reducing to a tit-for-tat retaliations I'd thought
it best to get it adjudicated here.
I think it's X because it signed on the ground & in OS Locator as such.
He thinks it's Y because "Royal Mail PAF a
6 matches
Mail list logo
