On 07/02/2011 17:52, Ralph Smyth wrote:
The document is at:
www.dft.gov.uk/consultations/open/2011-02/roadsnetworkconsultation.pdf
Nearly - it is now:
http://www.dft.gov.uk/consultations/open/2011-02/roadnetworkconsultation.pdf
(37 pages of extreme verbosity later, losing the will to live on t
On 07/02/11 17:52, Ralph Smyth wrote:
The classification of UK roads on OSM very much follows official
designations, whereas in other countries it takes more account of what's
on the ground. Part of the DfT's justification for these proposals is to
enable local authorities to change highway desi
Consultation was launched last week about giving local authorities scope
to reclassify non-trunk roads.
Given that local authorities have a statutory deadline of the end of
March to finish off their Local Transport Plans, which set out their
policy for up to 20 years, some might suggest this is
>I am very interested in this data. I can host it if that's useful to
>people (assuming the traffic doesn't become crazy!).
That would be very useful, thanks. Depending on the data size I may be able to
host some of it too.
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing
Here's an interesting thing:
Locate Potteric Carr Nature Reserve (just south of Doncaster in JOSM
(or your other favourite, suitable editor) and view Bing aerial
imagery.
With the slider set midway, note the lush green marshes.
Zoom in - and eventually, the marshes, buildings and paths disappear
On 7 February 2011 13:36, Craig Loftus wrote:
> Peter Miller wrote:
> > What I don't see is any way to indicate that the information added could
> benefit from a ground-survey. NaPTAN imports include the tag
> NaPTAN:verified=no. Should we not have something similar for data
> > taken straight fr
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> That is absolutely _brilliant_!
Thanks for your kind words. Thanks to Tom, too. I will try to find time
later to respond to suggestions made both here and by private mail.
(Summary: I agree with some and disagree with others!)
> My faith in human nature is restored. :
Peter Miller wrote:
> What I don't see is any way to indicate that the information added could
> benefit from a ground-survey. NaPTAN imports include the tag
> NaPTAN:verified=no. Should we not have something similar for data
> taken straight from OS Open data, regardless of whether it is traced
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 11:48 +, Phil Endecott wrote:
> You are welcome to take a copy of this data, if you would like it.
>
I am very interested in this data. I can host it if that's useful to
people (assuming the traffic doesn't become crazy!).
Cheers,
Henry
__
Hello Phil,
>> Am interested in using the OS OpenData contour set for an
>> augmented reality app for walkers (extension of the OpenTrailView
>> idea). What I have in mind is to load them into a database
>> and implement a lookup facility where the elevation at a
>> particular lat/lon can be o
On 7 February 2011 12:16, Graham Stewart wrote:
>
> Great work on this Peter, it's a really helpful tool.
>
> One suggestion: perhaps on the Area Summary page you could add an option to
> rank the missing roads by their approximate length/area*, rather simply
> alphabetically?
>
> Targetting the
On 7 February 2011 09:39, Ed Loach wrote:
> Peter (I think) wrote:
>
> > To my mind one the main benefits of the bot I have suggested is
> the reliable
> > attribution of content that comes with it. When a name is added
> from os locator
> > then there is always a 'source:name=os locator' added a
Great work on this Peter, it's a really helpful tool.
One suggestion: perhaps on the Area Summary page you could add an
option to rank the missing roads by their approximate
length/area*, rather simply alphabetically?
Targetting the largest incorrectly named roads first seems like a
good way to
Hi Nick,
Nick Whitelegg wrote:
Am interested in using the OS OpenData contour set for an
augmented reality app for walkers (extension of the OpenTrailView
idea). What I have in mind is to load them into a database
and implement a lookup facility where the elevation at a
particular lat/lon can
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am interested in using the OS OpenData contour set for an augmented
>> reality app for walkers (extension of the OpenTrailView idea). What I have
>> in mind is to load them into a database and implement a lookup facility
> where the elevation at a particular lat/lon can be obtai
Hi,
Am interested in using the OS OpenData contour set for an augmented
reality app for walkers (extension of the OpenTrailView idea). What I have
in mind is to load them into a database and implement a lookup facility
where the elevation at a particular lat/lon can be obtained by querying
Peter (I think) wrote:
> To my mind one the main benefits of the bot I have suggested is
the reliable
> attribution of content that comes with it. When a name is added
from os locator
> then there is always a 'source:name=os locator' added as well so
anyone coming
> along later knows. When geom
Hi,
Am interested in using the OS OpenData contour set for an augmented reality app
for walkers (extension of the OpenTrailView idea). What I have in mind is to
load them into a database and implement a lookup facility where the elevation
at a particular lat/lon can be obtained by querying the
18 matches
Mail list logo
