But which signs are we talking about here? I'd not expect Sustrans "Ranger"
signs to figure in the DfT Traffic signs manual.
Cheers
Andy
From: Richard Mann [mailto:richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com]
Sent: 30 November 2011 15:59
To: Richard Fairhurst
Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject:
They're not approved in the signs regs, which I think has jurisdiction.
IANAL etc.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Richard Mann wrote:
> > There are also some non-approved stickers that Sustrans have put
> > up in various places.
>
> Not sure which stickers you're refe
Richard Mann wrote:
> There are also some non-approved stickers that Sustrans have put
> up in various places.
Not sure which stickers you're referring to, but IIRC Sustrans 'Ranger'
stickers are approved for use by almost all highway authorities in England,
including Oxfordshire. (The two I'm un
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 02:05:52PM +, Ed Loach wrote:
> In your first example,
>
> > they're all double-labeled, EG: http://cycle.st/p34892
>
> Seems to be located on Northmoor Road according to the accompanying
> map, yet the route seems to be drawn on Charlbury Road.
The geolocation was w
The geolocation in cyclestreets is wrong. The route has been on Charlbury
Road since the early nineties, and the signs since the late nineties.
There are also some non-approved stickers that Sustrans have put up in
various places.
Richard
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Ed Loach wrote:
> In y
In your first example,
> they're all double-labeled, EG: http://cycle.st/p34892
Seems to be located on Northmoor Road according to the accompanying
map, yet the route seems to be drawn on Charlbury Road. Is the photo
just wrongly located in cycle streets, or has the route changed and
the sign is
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:11:20PM +, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>
> - Local cycle networks with objective, on-the-ground evidence
> (usually signposts) are tagged as lcn=yes (and lcn_ref=...,
> lcn_name=..., or the relations equivalent) as at present.
This sounds reasonable. Round here (Oxfor
Craig Loftus wrote:
Additionally the OS has also
committed to release a set of "National Trails" in collaboration with
Natural England, by April 2013. 2013? What happened to just getting
the data out-there?
By 2013 I suspect that a few of the national trails will have every gate
and stile mar
Tom Hughes [mailto:t...@compton.nu] wrote:
> Sent: 30 November 2011 11:11
> To: Andy Robinson
> Cc: 'Craig Loftus'; 'talk-gb OSM List (E-mail)'
> Subject: Re: Further Detail on Open Data Measures in the Autumn Statement
> 2011
>
> On 30/11/11 11:01, Andy Robinson wrote:
>
> > Has anyone been able
On 30/11/11 11:01, Andy Robinson wrote:
Has anyone been able to get at any data from the NAG? Page 11 of yesterday's
statement says "Any user can access data from the National Address Gazetteer
for free to initially test, evaluate and develop into new and innovative
products." which doesn't exac
Has anyone been able to get at any data from the NAG? Page 11 of yesterday's
statement says "Any user can access data from the National Address Gazetteer
for free to initially test, evaluate and develop into new and innovative
products." which doesn't exactly leave me thinking the actual data will
As part of Osborne's statement yesterday a document titled "Further
Detail on Open Data Measures in the Autumn Statement 2011" was
released.
www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/sites/default/files/resources/Further_detail_on_Open_Data_measures_in_the_Autumn_Statement_2011.pdf
Of specific interest to OSM are
12 matches
Mail list logo
