However, there are also instances of highway=no, where roads have been
realigned or ripped up, should these also be removed from the database?
I think highway=no is typically used as a temporary tag to try to stop
remote mappers from adding something from a source that is not up to
date. In
According to this Highways Agency article there's a new section of Regional
Cycle Route 90 waiting to be mapped:
http://www.highways.gov.uk/news/pressrelease.aspx?pressreleaseid=424913
Are there any mappers in or near Brighton that fancy going out and adding it
to our coverage?
I
Don't know if I did it right, but I mapped Wem millennium garden using leisure
=park, designation =Wem millennium garden.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/147994711.
Phil
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 04/07/2012 12:42 Rob Nickerson wrote:
Hi All,
I am looking for suggestions on how
Searching OSM for name=Millennium Green shows that these are currently
mapped as:
* parks
* village greens
* nature reserves
* recreation grounds
* common land
To me it looks like leisure=park is best (with the others used only when the
exact same land area is also designated as
On 4 July 2012 09:39, Craig Loftus craigloftus+...@googlemail.com wrote:
However, there are also instances of highway=no, where roads have been
realigned or ripped up, should these also be removed from the database?
I think highway=no is typically used as a temporary tag to try to stop
Millennium Greens cover a wide range of on the ground usages. Same
are clearly gardens, some parks, some nature reserves. Please do not
retag these features to some perceived standard. I would also avoid
overloading the designation key - better to have an explicit key than
to reuse and existing
Looking at the page on boundary=protected_area, perhaps class 7 is
the right one for Millennium Greens?
From
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area#Bac
kground
There are no protected areas for the United Kingdom in the WDPA
So I'd say probably not
Ed
There is the boundary=reserve proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Reserve#Examples
But can you really call Millennium Greens, Doorstep Greens and CROW Open
Access Areas reserves? Not so sure. Having said that I do like the idea
of a boundary=something,
are clearly gardens, some parks, some nature reserves. Please do not
retag these features to some perceived standard. I would also avoid
overloading the designation key - better to have an explicit key than
to reuse and existing key.
About the only thing these area have in common is that
On 4 July 2012 15:19, rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not intending to twist an existing tag (some of which are highly debated
anyway - e.g. landuse and landcover), just trying to identify which if any
are of use for these cases. Okay which is preferred out of:
* designation =
What problem? None really. Just trying to add some details to this aspect
of OSM. Although the funding is provided by the lottery the land has a
designation within central government. The fact that the land is designated
a millennium green means that certain conditions exist. Quoting from
On 4 July 2012 09:39, Craig Loftus craigloftus+...@googlemail.com wrote:
I think highway=no is typically used as a temporary tag to try to stop
remote mappers from adding something from a source that is not up to
date.
… However, what
is the argument for keeping connections between
12 matches
Mail list logo
