Donald,
On 29 March 2013 10:36, Donald Noble drno...@gmail.com wrote:
Hullo all,
Wondering if anyone can shed any light on this. I added a street/name
following a survey a couple of weeks ago, but it is still showing as missing
on the ITO OSM analysis map.
Should be name = Columba Terrace
I have managed to get hold of a couple of maps from our Parish Council with the
prow reference numbers written on them. The map itself is marked as not to be
photo copied and appears to have been issued by Derbyshire County Council. It
dates back to 2004.
Is it going to be OK for me to use
Hello,
I am still not clear of the outcome of how to add the references to OSM,
there doesn't appear to be any standard format across each local authority.
A better source for the data is probably www.rowmaps.com Derbyshire data is
available from there, it's released under an OS Open Data
The conclusion seemed to be to add the reference in the same format as used
by the Local Authority. Some include the parish name, some also include FP
for footpath etc. As your data is from a Parish level it's unclear
whether the Local Authority will include the parish name before any numbers
-
Is it going to be OK for me to use this map to put the prow_ref numbers into
OSM? I assume the base map is OS and subject to their copyright but the
numbers appear to have been penned on. I will only use it for the numbers
and not for drawing anything else.
The Council provides an online map
As suggested I've downloaded the kml file for Derbyshire and found a plugin to
view it in JOSM. The paths have a code DY|AV3|3/1 for example. It would seem
County Council=Derbyshire (DY), Borough Council= Amber Valley (AV). The number
3 appears to relate to the parish. (i.e. it changes as
Many Thanks
I'll use the code without the county council letters as this is what is in the
name tag in JOSM. I'll debate as to whether to split the path number according
to the last number as this would require quite a bit of work and I've still not
mapped all the paths in the parish yet!
I'll use the code without the county council letters as this is what is in the
name tag in JOSM. I'll debate as to whether to
split the path number according to the last number as this would require quite
a bit of work and I've still not mapped all the
paths in the parish yet!
As you refer
Dudley,
On 29 March 2013 15:25, Dudley Ibbett dudleyibb...@hotmail.com wrote:
Many Thanks
I'll use the code without the county council letters as this is what is in
the name tag in JOSM. I'll debate as to whether to split the path number
according to the last number as this would require
9 matches
Mail list logo
