Brian, see this thread, think it is a broken coastline.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2014-August/070493.html
Phil (trigpoint )
On Mon Aug 18 2014 19:33:04 GMT+0100 (BST), Brian Savidge wrote:
> Looking around a bit more, it looks like Stroud is also suffering problems
> where
Looking around a bit more, it looks like Stroud is also suffering problems
where its submerged when the zoom level is at 500m (all other zoom levels seem
fine for that area). I've tried zooming around other parts of the UK and this
problem doesn't seem to exist, so I can only guess its a local
I should have said, you see different things at different zoom levels
From: a_sn...@hotmail.com
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 18:15:42 +
Subject: [Talk-GB] River Severn Dried up in places
What has gone wrong with the River Severn around Sharpness, near Berkeley,
Gl
What has gone wrong with the River Severn around Sharpness, near Berkeley,
Gloucestershire?
It looks like someone has been adding in the sand banks at the same level as
the waterway=riverbank. My guess is OpenStreetMap doesn't know which one takes
priority and the sandbanks have won. I am al
On 18/08/14 12:15, SK53 wrote:
There are plenty of examples of people building routers for people with
restricted mobility using OSM data (for instance wheelchair users, blind
people etc). Most of us will map steps on footways simply because even
one step acts as a barrier to wheelchair users or
Hi David,
Most of these problems are issues for a router for interpreting OSM data,
rather than specific problems for the data.
There are plenty of examples of people building routers for people with
restricted mobility using OSM data (for instance wheelchair users, blind
people etc). Most of us
On 18/08/14 11:41, David Woolley wrote:
>Considering the longer term problems:
>
>1) There needs to be better guidance to routing software
>developers on how to route when there are parallel
>features accessible on foot;
Agreed. The things that give our routing engine problems are:
- dual carr
On 18/08/14 10:59, SomeoneElse wrote:
Whilst the existance of a highway=pedestrian area that isn't connected
is an indication of something, it's usually just an indication of that
mapping in a particular area is not complete.
Considering the longer term problems:
1) There needs to be better gu
I have already notified tye data working group. The user was contacted, his
imaginary work was not reverted and he was not blocked, he continues to add
complete junk from his armchair. He needs to be stopped.
On 18 August 2014 10:59:22 GMT+01:00, SomeoneElse
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>User "Gavaasuren" ha
Hi,
User "Gavaasuren" has been adding a series of imaginary footpaths over
the last few weeks, each with the changeset comment "zwischen
Fußgängerzonen und Straßen Fußweg erstellt". What they seem to be doing
is joining "pedestrian islands" to random nearby roads in order to
resolve "routing
10 matches
Mail list logo
