I see there are no changeset comments either. Have you started a changeset
discussion? I can't tell on the mobile.
On April 23, 2015 12:25:10 AM GMT+01:00, "Dave F."
wrote:
>Hi
>
>User abc26324 has been changing place=suburb to neighbourhood. This
>edits are widespread so I doubt he has local
Hi
User abc26324 has been changing place=suburb to neighbourhood. This
edits are widespread so I doubt he has local knowledge. The ones near my
vicinity seem erroneous.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30417434?node_page=1
He's adding place=farm tags. Is this still current? I thought
On 22/04/15 20:38, SK53 wrote:
> Despite objections to a trade name, the current tag does reflect what
> these are called by waterway users in the UK. Elsan has long entered
> standard english as a synonym for chemical toilet. Personally I would
> have tried to choose something a little more generi
Here are some totally typical prior taggings of this feature (in land
vehicle form):
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3075600244
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/369645049
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.or
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Colin Smale wrote:
> Is there any intrinsic difference between one for boats and one for
> motorhomes? If they are actually pretty much the same thing, maybe the
> difference would better be expressed by "*access=customers*" or purely
> *geometric*/geographic pr
I too have problems with the name of this proposed tag, as follows:
1) It's not recognisably British English. This has been the default for tag
names since the inception of the project, mainly to avoid natural
complications when en-us and en-gb differ. As a native Brit I wouldn't have
a clue what
On 22/04/15 19:07, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> Others objected to the use of a trade name.
> Thus *sanitary_dump_station* as an attempt at a generic term with a good
> chance of understanding when translated into multiple languages, and a
> good match to the customary terms used locally. The scheme's w
Is there any intrinsic difference between one for boats and one for
motorhomes? If they are actually pretty much the same thing, maybe the
difference would better be expressed by "access=customers" or purely
geometric/geographic properties.
On 2015-04-22 20:07, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> On Wed,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 3:39 AM, Richard Fairhurst
wrote:
> Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> > What can we assume the UK tag "waterway=elsan_point" means? One or more
> > of:
> >
> > 1) Walk up toilet
> > 2) Cassette dump for boats
> > 3) Cassette dump for motorhomes
> > 4) Pump out
>
> Very firmly and
Greetings,
Is there a friendly mapper out there local to Stanford-le-Hope who wouldn’t
mind surveying the new Sorrell’s Rounabout junction at The Manorway /
Corringham Road? OSM at present has only part of the change and Google has
slightly more (the top third of the new roundabout), but still
Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> Are what's presently tagged "elsan_point" *both* walk up toilets *and*
> CDP chemical holding tank emptying points?
No. A toilet is tagged as a toilet. An Elsan point, where you can empty your
Elsan or equivalent, is tagged as an Elsan point.
> And do they welcome waste or
Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> What can we assume the UK tag "waterway=elsan_point" means? One or more
> of:
>
> 1) Walk up toilet
> 2) Cassette dump for boats
> 3) Cassette dump for motorhomes
> 4) Pump out
Very firmly and unambiguously 2.
> I propose making the assumption the present elsan_point t
On 22/04/2015 08:04, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
What can we assume the UK tag "waterway=elsan_point" means? One or more of:
1) Walk up toilet
2) Cassette dump for boats
3) Cassette dump for motorhomes
4) Pump out
The only safe assumption is (2)
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:51 PM, Malcolm Herring <
malcolm.herr...@btinternet.com> wrote:
> On 21/04/2015 18:08, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
>
>> Are what's presently tagged "elsan_point" /both/ walk up toilets
>> /and/ CDP chemical holding tank emptying points?
>> And do they welcome waste originating
14 matches
Mail list logo