Hi all,
Given that paths and footways are now rendered the same way in the default
OSM style I wonder whether it is time to look at how the map can provide
better information.
For rural mappers tagging a path/footway as unpaved surface results in it
having less prominence on the map. As most
On 8/16/2015 1:57 PM, ajt1...@gmail.com wrote:
Until I provided a counter-example there, the only example on
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/747 was of a
well-mapped central European city. If there is evaluation of the
results in both rural and urban settings in
On 16 August 2015 at 21:06, ajt1...@gmail.com ajt1...@gmail.com
That makes some sense, but OSM-Carto's biggest problem is that a number of
the changes over the last year have been dedicated to making well-mapped
central European urban areas look nice at the expense of the rest of the
planet.
On 16 August 2015 at 22:57, ajt1...@gmail.com ajt1...@gmail.com wrote:
Until I provided a counter-example there, the only example on
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/747 was of a
well-mapped central European city. If there is evaluation of the results in
both rural and
A reminder that we will be in Derby for the pub meeting this month. We will
be trying a new venue: The Old Silk Mill. (There were lots of other
attractive suggestions, but juggling distance from bus station, football
matches etc. led me to his one). If it is not to everyone's taste we can
try one
On 16/08/2015 22:04, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
On 16 August 2015 at 22:57, ajt1...@gmail.com ajt1...@gmail.com wrote:
Until I provided a counter-example there, the only example on
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/747 was of a
well-mapped central European city. If there
As this has dropped off the active thread list a bit.
I'd broadly agree with this, though I'm more corporate sponsors than members.
My feeling on responding with a greater emphasis on community rather than
techy stuff was that those OSM discussions I've been to (mapping parties in
Gravesend,
On 16/08/2015 18:26, Rob Nickerson wrote:
Hi all,
Given that paths and footways are now rendered the same way in the
default OSM style I wonder whether it is time to look at how the map
can provide better information.
For rural mappers tagging a path/footway as unpaved surface results in
On 16/08/2015 21:20, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
On 16 August 2015 at 21:06, ajt1...@gmail.com ajt1...@gmail.com
That makes some sense, but OSM-Carto's biggest problem is that a number of
the changes over the last year have been dedicated to making well-mapped
central European urban areas look
9 matches
Mail list logo