Re: [Talk-GB] Schools Progress Tracker Update

Robert wrote: > Just a quick note to say that I've updated the matching used in my > tool at http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/schools/progress/ so that > OSM > objects with a ref:edubase, ref:seedcode, or ref:deniirn that > matches > an entry on the official list will now always be 'matched' in my

[Talk-GB] Schools Progress Tracker Update

Just a quick note to say that I've updated the matching used in my tool at http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/schools/progress/ so that OSM objects with a ref:edubase, ref:seedcode, or ref:deniirn that matches an entry on the official list will now always be 'matched' in my tool. (Previously the match

[Talk-GB] OSM with Wikidata: 27,232 matches found in England

I've extended my search for matches between OSM and Wikidata. It now covers all of England instead of just the West Midlands. The results are grouped by region or county as well as by category. http://edwardbetts.com/osm-wikidata/england/ It should be possible to use this a basis for uploading.

Re: [Talk-GB] Schools Progress Tracker Update

2016-01-24 11:42 GMT+00:00 Ed Loach : > Stuart wrote: > >> 1 site, 2 schools: >> • boundary has amenity=school >> • buildings have school names & e.g. edubase tags. I used amenity=school for >> the individual buildings though, as well as building=school. It should >> probably

Re: [Talk-GB] Schools Progress Tracker Update

On 24/01/16 13:09, Lester Caine wrote: > That just leave 4 more objects to check :) OK most of the 'red dot' items were out of area, but I've tidied them up anyway as they are still Worcestershire. Pershore College has been sort of solved by following the current signage ;) It has 'Part of

Re: [Talk-GB] Schools Progress Tracker Update

Stuart wrote: > 1 site, 2 schools: > • boundary has amenity=school > • buildings have school names & e.g. edubase tags. I used amenity=school for > the individual buildings though, as well as building=school. It should > probably > only be building=school, really, as the site is the amenity.

Re: [Talk-GB] Schools Progress Tracker Update

> > The site relation page however > > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Site#Prop > osal > > suggests it should be multipolygon and not site - > > "For example the tag amenity=school describes the perimeter of > the school grounds, for schools with multiple sites the

Re: [Talk-GB] Schools Progress Tracker Update

On 24/01/16 10:43, Ed Loach wrote: > But the above and my edits yesterday make me wonder if we can settle on a way > to map two schools that share grounds. I have been tagging the grounds as > amenity=school, and the separate buildings for the two schools with the > different ref:edubase etc

Re: [Talk-GB] [Imports] OSM with Wikidata: 27, 232 matches found in England

Hi, All looking interesting! Skimming around some of the data I know and the vasy majority of it is looking sensible and useful. I'm curious how The Shard ended up matching against its correct match but also London Bridge station? The station doesn't seem to have any matching metadata:

Re: [Talk-GB] Schools Progress Tracker Update

Great stuff. I've corrected a couple of my mistakes you've flagged. Would it be possible to add the area location so we can check the ones where we have more local knowledge? If we let you know the why certain schools are flagging an error could you update your list with an extra column to

Re: [Talk-GB] Schools Progress Tracker Update

On 24/01/16 16:14, Dave F wrote: > If we let you know the why certain schools are flagging an error could > you update your list with an extra column to indicate the reason? It > would save users from double checking. Since a number of them are down to me, and ARE correct, that would be useful ;)

Re: [Talk-GB] OSM with Wikidata: 27,232 matches found in England

On 24/01/16 11:46, Edward Betts wrote: > It should be possible to use this a basis for uploading. The results can be > grouped by category and county when uploaded. Looks like you are still using your original data? http://edwardbetts.com/osm-wikidata/england/county/Worcestershire/Schools St.

Re: [Talk-GB] Schools Progress Tracker Update

DY almost complete so you need to pick another area. TF needs some attention rgds Brian On 24 Jan 2016 14:36, "Lester Caine" wrote: > On 24/01/16 13:09, Lester Caine wrote: > > That just leave 4 more objects to check :) > > OK most of the 'red dot' items were out of area, but

Re: [Talk-GB] Schools Progress Tracker Update

On 24/01/16 17:53, Brian Prangle wrote: > DY almost complete so you need to pick another area. TF needs some > attention rgds Brian I'll head over to HR ... although the corner of 'B' covering Worcestershire still needs some work. Covering areas I've contacts who can check things on the ground.

Re: [Talk-GB] Schools Progress Tracker Update

On 24 January 2016 at 16:14, Dave F wrote: > Would it be possible to add the area location so we can check the ones where > we have more local knowledge? I've added the postcodes from the official data to the second table on

Re: [Talk-GB] Schools Progress Tracker Update

On Sun, 2016-01-24 at 17:53 +, Brian Prangle wrote: > DY almost complete so you need to pick another area. TF needs some > attention rgds Brian I have done some work on rural TF, hopefully it has moved off the bottom of the league table. I am avoiding the urban area for now as a I back at The