I've had a play with this since I've been working with overpass turbo a bit
recently; the best I've come up with so far is something like this:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/fPR (wy over-commented ;))
As you'll see, this does include these roads, but does also include roads
leaving the area.
If
Draft articles:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NbHiUcQjz0SHKlt6BzGp2z_Lo1YH1RmdEZ2kMkpNI04/edit
*Rob*
On 23 April 2016 at 16:10, Rob Nickerson wrote:
>
> To breed a culture of Member-led organisation (with Directors as figure
> heads) I suggest:
>
>1. Directors have all the power
>
On 22/04/16 12:14, Brian Prangle wrote:
>
> *Full powers*. Standard boilerplate text. Easy to do. Downside is
> that removing powers may require alterations to AoA, and furthermore
> restricting Directors' powers is quite likely to end up being
> contentious. Any such process will a
Unsure if it's the reason but Church Road doesn't share all the nodes.
At the junction of Stoney Lane it's inside the boundary.
I wouldn't lay multiple ways on top of each other as in Landsdowne
Place. The main point of relations was to allow entities such as
boundaries to be tagged into ways
Hi all,
It has been a very long time since I last posted here!
I'm trying to use the Overpass API to extract all the roads within the
bounds of a relation, in this case a local government ward. Can anyone spot
the problem in the data?
Here's the example I'm working with:
http://overpass-turbo.eu
Announced yesterday: Tesco is set to introduce defibrillators in over
900 of its largest stores
http://www.tescoplc.com/index.asp?pageid=17&newsid=1350
Dave F.
On 22/04/2016 14:43, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
It was suggested that trying to increase our mapping of public
Defibrillator
6 matches
Mail list logo