Hi Chris, Philip
I take your point about the buildings polygons being very low quality.
The merging is not too bad in rural areas like these where the building
density is low, but a lot of detail is missing. My plan was just to use
the OS stuff as a starting point, then modify the polygon usin
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 303, is now available online in
English,
giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap
world:
http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/7456
- Highlights ...
- *... “*urban mappers*” and a regulation bill, which tries to regulate
On 13/05/16 11:17, Dave F wrote:
I think you're combining two separate issues.
Designated cycle route NCN4 was implemented along the K&A canal long
before 2012. There a was short time when a free license was required to
officially use it.
Whether individual people had a license or not made no d
I think you're combining two separate issues.
Designated cycle route NCN4 was implemented along the K&A canal long
before 2012. There a was short time when a free license was required to
officially use it.
Whether individual people had a license or not made no difference to
it's status.
Da
On 12/05/16 23:53, Andy Townsend wrote:
It depends where you are, I think. Certainly the canal towpath nearest
to me (Cromford Canal) is mostly public footpath. It's all been
surveyed, and the designation has been added fairly conservatively, i.e.
only where there's signage, and even on that bas
David Woolley wrote:
> For canal towpaths, bicycle=designated is misleading, as it tends
> to imply a public right of way, whereas these are normally
> access=permissive, and privately owned by the Canal and River
> Trust.
Again, Scotland is different. :)
Scotland's canals didn't go to CRT: th
6 matches
Mail list logo
