Re: [Talk-GB] National Park extensions

2016-08-17 Thread Andy Townsend
On 17/08/2016 16:42, jc...@mail.com wrote: As a result much of what has been added is inaccurate, not least because many nodes are shared with highways etc. despite the written descriptions clearly stating "...it follows the edge..." (Yorkshire Dales was mostly clean of shared nodes but Lake D

Re: [Talk-GB] National Park extensions

2016-08-17 Thread Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
On 17 August 2016 at 16:42, jc...@mail.com wrote: > I know there has been some caution against using Natural England data > directly in OSM, so I wasn't surprised that the boundaries weren't > immediately updated when the Lake District and Yorkshire Dales National Parks > were expanded from 1st

[Talk-GB] National Park extensions

2016-08-17 Thread jc...@mail.com
I know there has been some caution against using Natural England data directly in OSM, so I wasn't surprised that the boundaries weren't immediately updated when the Lake District and Yorkshire Dales National Parks were expanded from 1st August. [1] However since coming back from holiday, I see

Re: [Talk-GB] ref:hectares on admin boundary, and non-responsive mapper

2016-08-17 Thread Colin Smale
I have already brought this to the attention of DWG. SomeoneElse has been attempting to moderate the tone on a couple of the changeset discussions. No idea if it is permanent, but alexkemp has switched his focus to houses/numbers in the last couple of days. //colin On 2016-08-17 13:58, Walter

Re: [Talk-GB] ref:hectares on admin boundary, and non-responsive mapper

2016-08-17 Thread Walter Nordmann
No, alex has never been blocked: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/alexkemp please contact DWG regards Walter ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] ref:hectares on admin boundary, and non-responsive mapper

2016-08-17 Thread Andrew Hain
Every account that has ever been blocked has a link from the profile called “Active blocks”. -- Andrew From: Paul Sladen Sent: 17 August 2016 11:04:20 To: Will Phillips Cc: Talk GB Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] ref:hectares on admin boundary, and non-responsive mapper

Re: [Talk-GB] Possible use of OS triangulation stations to determine aerial imagery offset

2016-08-17 Thread Greg
Thanks David. I have contacted OS using the contact form on their website in the hope that they may publish the data under the OGL. I think it would be helpful in accurately determining imagery offset. Thanks, Greg. On Tue, Aug 16, 2016, at 09:00 PM, David Woolley wrote: > On 16/08/16 15:22, Gre

Re: [Talk-GB] ref:hectares on admin boundary, and non-responsive mapper

2016-08-17 Thread Paul Sladen
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016, Will Phillips wrote: > On 15/08/2016 08:39, Colin Smale wrote: > > "This is an automated response: sorry, but I'm too busy mapping too be > > able to spare the time to respond to you. Thank you for your interest > > in my mapping. -Alex Kemp" > I have raised this issue with t