Harry, and everyone else,
I'm sure Brian will get back to everyone on all of this when he's back in
circulation. He's not been around since these issues were raised. There is
obviously a lot to digest and clearly there are some specific points to take on
board so I'm sure when he's had time to
On 24/03/2017 19:17, ael wrote:
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 06:57:58PM +, Chris Hill wrote:
On 24/03/2017 17:58, ael wrote:
I have just noticed a newish mapper who has added many footpaths around
Oxfordshire apparently using Bing but with changset comments
"from countryside access map".
Is t
Hi
https://www.oxfordshire.gov.uk/cms/content/countryside-access-maps
The PROWs are issued under OGL.
The Crown Copyright is relevant to the OS map the PROWs have been
overlaid on in this example *only*.
https://www.oxfordshire.gov.uk/countrysidemap/
The PROW data remains OGL. This has been
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 06:57:58PM +, Chris Hill wrote:
> On 24/03/2017 17:58, ael wrote:
> > I have just noticed a newish mapper who has added many footpaths around
> > Oxfordshire apparently using Bing but with changset comments
> > "from countryside access map".
> >
> > Is this copyright fr
On 24/03/17 18:47, Dave F wrote:
What will? Isn't this issued under OGL?
I think the questions were being asked because the copyright owner and
licence status wasn't known.
If it has OGL, it might actually be covered by Crown Copyright, which
might result in a different period of time.
I
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 348,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things
happening in the openstreetmap world:
http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/8885/
Enjoy!
weeklyOSM?
who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages
On 24/03/2017 17:58, ael wrote:
I have just noticed a newish mapper who has added many footpaths around
Oxfordshire apparently using Bing but with changset comments
"from countryside access map".
Is this copyright free? I have sent a polite message welcoming to OSM,
but pointing out that rural f
On 24/03/2017 18:30, David Woolley wrote:
On 24/03/17 17:58, ael wrote:
Is this copyright free?
Under UK law, it will have, as a minimum, database rights for 15 years
from publication.
What will? Isn't this issued under OGL?
DaveF
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast anti
On 24/03/17 17:58, ael wrote:
Is this copyright free?
Under UK law, it will have, as a minimum, database rights for 15 years
from publication.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
I have just noticed a newish mapper who has added many footpaths around
Oxfordshire apparently using Bing but with changset comments
"from countryside access map".
Is this copyright free? I have sent a polite message welcoming to OSM,
but pointing out that rural footpaths usually need a visit, and
I've created a wiki page specifically about the tree data import.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Birmingham_City_Council_trees_data
It would be better if somebody involved in running the import, would do this
(per the Import Guidelines), but I've drawn together various info I could find
fr
2017-03-24 11:31 GMT+00:00 Andy Mabbett :
> On 24 March 2017 at 00:48, Andy Townsend wrote:
>
>> On 19/03/2017 14:57, Andy Mabbett wrote:
>>>
>>> "On 19 March 2017 at 13:13, ajt1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19/03/2017 12:52, Andy Mabbett wrote:
>
> I'm told that Brian has been blocke
On 24 March 2017 at 00:48, Andy Townsend wrote:
> On 19/03/2017 14:57, Andy Mabbett wrote:
>>
>> "On 19 March 2017 at 13:13, ajt1...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> On 19/03/2017 12:52, Andy Mabbett wrote:
I'm told that Brian has been blocked for these edits This is
outrageous.
>>>
>>> N
On 24 March 2017 at 01:11, Andy Townsend wrote:
> I suspect that it's unavoidable that if a prominent member of a group or
> organisations says or does something, that people think that it's at the
> very least condoned by that organisation.
and:
> (for the avoidance of doubt, writing this in a
14 matches
Mail list logo