Re: [Talk-GB] Proposed Import of UK Shell Filling Stations

2017-05-11 Thread Dave F
1. Wouldn't it be better to sort out your trees first? 2. What does ref_unused_tags.name refer to? 3. Are there any out of date stations that need removing/changing to another operator? DaveF On 11/05/2017 21:36, Brian Prangle wrote: Hi everyone There is a proposal for this import

Re: [Talk-GB] Proposed Import of UK Shell Filling Stations

2017-05-11 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 05/11/2017 11:47 PM, David Woolley wrote: > On 11/05/17 21:36, Brian Prangle wrote: >> There is a proposal for this import currently under discussion on the >> talk import mailing list and the OSMUK chapter has asked the proposer >> that it be discussed on the talk GB mailing list Link to

[Talk-GB] Proposed Import of UK Shell Filling Stations

2017-05-11 Thread Brian Prangle
Hi everyone There is a proposal for this import currently under discussion on the talk import mailing list and the OSMUK chapter has asked the proposer that it be discussed on the talk GB mailing list Regards Brian ___ Talk-GB mailing list

Re: [Talk-GB] Public Rights of Way data for Cambridgeshire

2017-05-11 Thread John Aldridge
One bit of feedback, from a first try at doing this for real: footpaths often cross parish boundaries, and at least in this area change their reference when they do so. But your slippy map only displays geometry for a single parish at a time, meaning that tracking the prow_ref value for the

[Talk-gb-london] ☀how are you?

2017-05-11 Thread charlesyarnold
Hello, Just writing to ask how are you doing and to show you something really cool, just take a look http://oaks.smartphonerings.mobi Sincerely, charlesyarnold From: talk-gb-london [mailto:talk-gb-london@openstreetmap.org] Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 10:50 AM To:

Re: [Talk-GB] Public Rights of Way data for Cambridgeshire

2017-05-11 Thread Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
On 11 May 2017 at 08:04, John Aldridge wrote: > On 11-May-17 00:20, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: >> The presence of prow_ref=* >> tags to allow matching with official data is almost non-existent.) > > So what's the best way to fix this? > > If I click on your map, it shows

Re: [Talk-GB] Public Rights of Way data for Cambridgeshire

2017-05-11 Thread Andy Allan
On 11 May 2017 at 09:07, Dan S wrote: > Congratulations Robert! The long thread of letters is... educational! To put it mildly! Well done Robert, not only on the outcome but also in keeping calm and civil during the protracted correspondence. My highlight of the saga

Re: [Talk-GB] Public Rights of Way data for Cambridgeshire

2017-05-11 Thread John Aldridge
On 11-May-17 00:20, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: The presence of prow_ref=* tags to allow matching with official data is almost non-existent.) So what's the best way to fix this? If I click on your map, it shows me something like Teversham FP 3 (MS: 0 | ΔL/L: —) which is a bit