Re: [Talk-GB] Importing Shell fuel stations

2017-12-29 Thread Mick Orridge
On 28/12/17 22:33, Warin wrote: On 29-Dec-17 07:28 AM, Mark Goodge wrote: On 28/12/2017 19:31, Lester Caine wrote: Get the return address right ... On 28/12/17 16:12, Colin Spiller wrote: I've been adding postcodes in the Bradford BD area using Robert & gregrs useful tools. I've just notic

Re: [Talk-GB] Importing Shell fuel stations

2017-12-29 Thread Ian Caldwell
It was the only house between two junctions on a road. It was in the country. Ian On 29 December 2017 at 13:08, Mark Goodge wrote: > > > On 29/12/2017 11:41, Ian Caldwell wrote: > >> >> >> >> On 29 December 2017 at 10:47, Mark Goodge > m...@good-stuff.co.uk>> wrote: >> >> since a filling s

Re: [Talk-GB] Non-free sources [was: Re: Importing Shell fuel stations]

2017-12-29 Thread David Woolley
On 29/12/17 13:05, Mark Goodge wrote: We draw the line at using a source which is subject to database right, and where using the content would be an infringement of that right. We also don't allow material used in breach of contract, even if only a click wrap contract. Google Street View fall

Re: [Talk-GB] Importing Shell fuel stations

2017-12-29 Thread Mark Goodge
On 29/12/2017 11:41, Ian Caldwell wrote: On 29 December 2017 at 10:47, Mark Goodge > wrote: since a filling station isn't going to be large enough to have a single-user postcode Not necessarily I used to own a three bedroom house that had its own po

Re: [Talk-GB] Non-free sources [was: Re: Importing Shell fuel stations]

2017-12-29 Thread Mark Goodge
On 29/12/2017 11:14, Andy Mabbett wrote: On 29 December 2017 at 08:30, Adam Snape wrote: Speaking generally, I don't think it's good practice to be using non-free resources like this to research information which is not clear from open data, even if we don't use the information directly. A

Re: [Talk-GB] Importing Shell fuel stations

2017-12-29 Thread Ian Caldwell
On 29 December 2017 at 10:47, Mark Goodge wrote: > since a filling station isn't going to be large enough to have a > single-user postcode > > Not necessarily I used to own a three bedroom house that had its own postcode. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-G

[Talk-GB] Non-free sources [was: Re: Importing Shell fuel stations]

2017-12-29 Thread Andy Mabbett
On 29 December 2017 at 08:30, Adam Snape wrote: > Speaking generally, I don't think it's good practice to be using > non-free resources like this to research information which is > not clear from open data, even if we don't use the information > directly. Are you happy for people to enter into O

Re: [Talk-GB] Importing Shell fuel stations

2017-12-29 Thread Mark Goodge
On 28/12/2017 22:33, Warin wrote: Could the post code be derived from surrounding features? I don't know how detailed the post codes there are .. but if features in OSM surrounding it were of the same post code (and correct) then they could be used to derive the post code? It will almost c

Re: [Talk-GB] Importing Shell fuel stations

2017-12-29 Thread Mark Goodge
On 29/12/2017 08:30, Adam Snape wrote: Hi, I don't think we would delete a postcode found in other Open Data just on the basis of it not being in Codepoint Open; the error could lie in Codepoint Open itself. I suggest that a FIXME would be appropriate where two sources appear to contradict

Re: [Talk-GB] Importing Shell fuel stations

2017-12-29 Thread Adam Snape
Hi, I don't think we would delete a postcode found in other Open Data just on the basis of it not being in Codepoint Open; the error could lie in Codepoint Open itself. I suggest that a FIXME would be appropriate where two sources appear to contradict each other. Of course in this case we know th