There were a few mechanical edits removing tags about 7 or 8 months ago that caused some discussion and reverts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65131453
Personally I tend to enter the following when adding FHRS data in addition to any name and address fields that are missing: ・ FHRSID → <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fhrs:id> fhrs:id=* ・ LocalAuthorityBusinessID → <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fhrs:local_authority_id> fhrs:local_authority_id=* ・ LocalAuthorityName → <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fhrs:authority> fhrs:authority=* Regards Richard From: Andrew Hain [mailto:andrewhain...@hotmail.co.uk] Sent: 14 August 2019 15:18 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: [Talk-GB] Possible removal of FHRS tags Are the keys fhrs:rating (3358 occurences in Taginfo), fhrs:inspectiondate (1748), fhrs:confidence_management, fhrs:hygiene, fhrs:structural (621 each) and fhrs:rating_date (22) better off removed from our database, or should they be kept for businesses that disappear from FHRS listings when still open? What about fhrs:local_authority_id (11724)? Is fhrs:authority (12981) useful for businesses on borders? [https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/807942] Should any that are not kept be removed in bulk or added th discarded lists in editors? -- Andrew
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
