Community input to the plan is important. Any points you would like to
discuss can be added to
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Organised_Editing/Activities/National_Trust_Paths
On Tue, 3 Sep 2019, 07:02 Warin, <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 3/9/19 8:22 am, David Woolley wrote:
> >
On 3/9/19 8:22 am, David Woolley wrote:
On 02/09/2019 23:13, Warin wrote:
On 3/9/19 2:53 am, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
On 02/09/2019 14:58, David Woolley wrote:
This could conflict with a trend that I believe is developing, at
least for more formal roads, of removing signage, because it
dis
On 02/09/2019 23:13, Warin wrote:
On 3/9/19 2:53 am, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
On 02/09/2019 14:58, David Woolley wrote:
This could conflict with a trend that I believe is developing, at
least for more formal roads, of removing signage, because it
distracts drivers, and relying on satellite n
On 3/9/19 2:53 am, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
On 02/09/2019 14:58, David Woolley wrote:
This could conflict with a trend that I believe is developing, at
least for more formal roads, of removing signage, because it
distracts drivers, and relying on satellite navigators to provide the
informati
Hi Donald,
We would of course love to help, that's 'we' as in 'OSMUK', but of course
it isn't something that can be done remotely. We will tweet about it on our
account to publicise.please suggest if there's anything else we could
do.
Regards,
Jez
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 3:22 PM
Hi
Bullet point replies:
* Under the PROW section why are the 'yes' values not 'designated'?
* byway_open_to_all_traffic - Why is motor vehicle 'private/no'?
* Clarify which tags are optional (ie horse for Footpaths)
* Designated ways aren't limited to
footway/bridleway/cycleway/track/pat
On 02/09/2019 17:50, Edward Bainton wrote:
Just a quick question: what sort of role should overpass turbo play in
my researches on this topic (and on canoe portages especially)?
I use it all the time when looking for things that people might have
mapped using tags that I wasn't aware of. In y
On 02/09/2019 14:58, David Woolley wrote:
This could conflict with a trend that I believe is developing, at
least for more formal roads, of removing signage, because it distracts
drivers, and relying on satellite navigators to provide the
information instead.
What evidence have you of this "t
Hi again Jez & others,
Just a quick question: what sort of role should overpass turbo play in my
researches on this topic (and on canoe portages especially)?
Is it an inductive browse for 'the feel of the map'? Do people like stats
when discussing new/changed tags, and if so what sort?
Answers t
On 02/09/2019 16:57, Mark Goodge wrote:
I'm a little puzzled by one of the lines on the permissions grid on
that page. There's a line for "Legal RoW but access discouraged", with
a suggested tagging of "discouraged/private" for pedestrians (and
similar tags for other users).
Quite apart from
On 02/09/2019 14:30, Jez Nicholson wrote:
Following on from their talk at the OSMUK AGM, the National Trust have
now created an official 'organised edit' page for their footpath project
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/National_Trust_Paths
I'm a little puzzled
On 02/09/2019 14:58, David Woolley wrote:
On 02/09/2019 14:48, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Sometimes they want us to add a "vehicle=no" to a track that has
absolutely no signposts whatsoever locally, meaning that nobody can
verify that vehicles are forbidden and no local motorist would be turned
away
Indeed, Frederik speaks wise words.
The role of OSMUK has been to handhold, that is 'support or guide (someone)
during a learning process or a period of change'. We've been there to
encourage them to work with the community to identify how they might tag,
and for them to publish their plans.
On M
On 02/09/2019 14:48, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Sometimes they want us to add a "vehicle=no" to a track that has
absolutely no signposts whatsoever locally, meaning that nobody can
verify that vehicles are forbidden and no local motorist would be turned
away
This could conflict with a trend that I be
Hi,
On 02.09.19 15:30, Jez Nicholson wrote:
> Following on from their talk at the OSMUK AGM, the National Trust have
> now created an official 'organised edit' page for their footpath
> project
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/National_Trust_Paths
It sounds like
Following on from their talk at the OSMUK AGM, the National Trust have now
created an official 'organised edit' page for their footpath project
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/National_Trust_Paths
___
Talk-GB mailing list
And this is the problem. One of the shop=yes entries in Southend on sea is The
Range. I wasn’t sure how to tag it (I was using iD for speed, and it’s list of
defined shop tags is fairly minimal) so I tried an overpass query on Name=The
Range.
I have found, variously (aside from those without a
Whilst we are on the subject of shops (I hope this isn't dragging the
discussion too far off topic) people may be interested how editors like iD
and Vespucci get lists of UK shop names to suggest in drop-downs. The Name
Suggestion Index contains json encoded descriptions of retail brands and
can be
Thanks for the heads up.
I specifically use it when I know that a shop exists, and am due to survey
it to say what it is. So I guess it doesn't hurt if those aren't
rendered..but please, people in general, don't just delete them.
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 1:43 PM Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) <
r
Since version 4.22 of the Carto map style (which was deployed a few
days ago), the generic shop=yes tag is no longer rendered on the
default OSM-Carto map at https://www.openstreetmap.org/ . For details
of the decision see
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/3697 .
In Great
20 matches
Mail list logo
