*Ahem* no offence to Simon, obviouslyhe's just trying to check out a
manufacturer's claims and opening a can of worms in the process.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 5:18 PM Dave F via Talk-GB <
talk-gb@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> On 09/10/2019 23:12, Warin wrote:
> >
> > I'd think to get that level
On 09/10/2019 23:12, Warin wrote:
I'd think to get that level of accuracy you 'd need readings over some
considerable time... days?
Otherwise you get bias from, as you hint, the atmospheric conditions,
the satellites in view - their bias, angles ..
Unless you have access to correction data,
Thanks Jez, that's all very encouraging.
Local to me is Peterborough.
Yes will definitely aim to progress this to a national-level conversation -
I'll loop back here once it's clearer what they think their needs are. (or
better on Loomio? Another OSM channel, who'd ha' thunk it ;)
Ditto the NCN
(Could you please ensure replies are sent to the forum. Thanks)
Roughly upto around 3-4 years ago, which is why I'm uncertain if a
sponsorship arrangement is in place.
DaveF
On 10/10/2019 07:41, Edward Bainton wrote:
Thanks for that.
I will ask re any formal sponsorship etc
May I ask how l
Hi Ed,
Good to see you lobbying on behalf of OSM. If they get really interested
and you want to hook the national level organisation then give us a shout
at OSMUK.
BTW, where is 'local' for you?
Looking on the bright side. Arguments *for* using OSM:
1. They/volunteers/helpers can add/edit locati
5 matches
Mail list logo
