Hi Tony,
Anybody interested in the scans are welcome to view, use or host them
(subject to the OGL) or suggest somewhere I can upload them. Beware that
the Statements are often brief, outdated or otherwise less useful than
might be imagined. The Survey cards date from circa 1950 and were working
d
Adam, thank you
Anderton and Adlington parishes are next to each other on the ground - a
good example of read across error which needs to be avoided.
Euxton Parish Council have published a recent LCC notice on their
website - http://www.euxtoncouncil.org.uk/news.php?id=83
which refers to PU
Hi,
Firstly, Tony, I think 9-4 is Anderton and 9-1 is Adlington.
As part of the original FOI/EIR/Re-use request for the GIS dataset, I also
requested (and was supplied) the council's scanned copies of the Definitive
Statements along with permission to use them under the OGL. They appear to
be co
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 at 14:32, Dave F via Talk-GB
wrote:
>
> On 26/11/2019 12:01, Tony OSM wrote:
> > to the preferred prow_ref format Adlington FP 5.
>
> As previous, this is not the preferred format. The format should be as
> supplied by the LA, the organisation which has the *authority* to nam
On 26/11/2019 12:01, Tony OSM wrote:
to the preferred prow_ref format Adlington FP 5.
As previous, this is not the preferred format. The format should be as
supplied by the LA, the organisation which has the *authority* to name
PROWs.
Creating a reference unique to OSM doesn't improve the d
Lancashire PROW data has been made available and is presented on
http://www.mapthepaths.org.uk/ and http://www.rowmaps.com/
The reference presented is in the style "9-4 5". I have researched and
analysed the data used by Rowmaps, read Lancashire County Council public
notices and noted that LCC
6 matches
Mail list logo
