Re: [Talk-GB] Stale Developments

2020-01-10 Thread Cj Malone via Talk-GB
In that case wouldn't it be handy to add 'survey:date=-MM-DD'? Plus that bumps the edit date that'd push it out of this, and related out-of-date tools. On 10 January 2020 14:42:11 GMT, Andy Robinson wrote: >Excellent Robert, very useful. > >Note that brownfield sites can remain that way for

Re: [Talk-GB] Stale Developments

2020-01-10 Thread Andy Robinson
Excellent Robert, very useful. Note that brownfield sites can remain that way for many many years before eventually being developed. I recall investigating brownfield sites in Birmingham as part of my degree in the 1980's (photogrammetry module). Some of those sites are still brownfield. Many h

Re: [Talk-GB] Stale Developments

2020-01-10 Thread Peter Neale via Talk-GB
Hi Robert, Thanks for producing this new tool.  I had already spotted the Bulldozer icon on the "Survey Me" map and, in my local area, I have already: Updated one Brownfield Site to Construction Site, where work has started after years of nothing.Deleted one Construction Site, where there is noth

[Talk-GB] Stale Developments

2020-01-10 Thread Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
I'd like to announce a new mini QA tool that I've put together for UK OSMers: Stale Developments: https://osm.mathmos.net/developments/ It finds OSM UK highway and landuse tags with tags values of construction, brownfield and greenfield, which haven't been edited for over a year. The idea is that