Could I suggest that, rather than second-guessing what some putative router
might or might not do, people actually try these scenarios with one of the many
real-world routers to see if they actually happen?
I see an awful lot of "may" and "might" in this thread, together with a liberal
Hi folks,
I got annoyed with tagging the number of modules in solar generators,
so I put together a quick crowdsourcing app to collect this data:
https://solartagger.ru.dev/
It's definitely a lot quicker than trying to do this in an editor!
Once we have panel counts that multiple people
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 532,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of a lot of
things happening in the openstreetmap world:
https://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/13803/
Enjoy!
Did you know that you can also submit messages for the weeklyOSM? Just log
Surely OpenStreetMAP is about creating a MAP? The clue is in the name.
So you map what's on the ground:
1. Put the flares in the right place (often they are wildly out).
2. If there is a "No U-turn" sign you add it, otherwise you don't.
Making a router work properly is a job for the person
On 04/10/2020 07:42, Edward Bainton wrote:
I've been marking them as false positives as to my mind it's obvious
that you wouldn't U-turn there (but equally, it would be legal to do so).
You would also probably need a vehicle with a tight turning circle, and
a quiet road - so agree it would be
I regularly get QA messages about this when I use the "ImproveOSM" in iD -
just about every roundabout near me has at least one.
I've been marking them as false positives as to my mind it's obvious that
you wouldn't U-turn there (but equally, it would be legal to do so).
But the points about
6 matches
Mail list logo
