Hi Ben,
Personally, I don’t see the point of
name: Swansea
name:en Swansea
name:cy Abertawe
It's stating the obvious that if name:cy is not the same as name: for a place
in Wales, the name attribute is the English, and visa versa. It’s a little
close to “tagging for the renderer” for my
On Wed, 2020-10-21 at 12:10 +0100, Ben Proctor wrote:
> Thanks to everyone who has chipped in on this thread so far.
>
> I'd like to draw out what I see as the key threads of the discussion
> so far:
> The use of :cy and :en name tags should be encouraged. It allows more
> flexibility in
Thanks to everyone who has chipped in on this thread so far.
I'd like to draw out what I see as the key threads of the discussion so far:
The use of :cy and :en name tags should be encouraged. It allows more
flexibility in rendering and adds clarity. So far this hasn't been a very
controversial
With regard to the discussion on the best transformation, OSM recommends that
all transformations from OSGB36 to WGS84 should be carried out using a
3-parameter transformation which is accurate to 21 metres.
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Converting_to_WGS84#Great_Britain
4 matches
Mail list logo
