On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 22:12:47 +0000 SomeoneElse <li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk> wrote:
> Over the weekend I spotted that Sheffield seems to have been added twice > recently: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/2510041800 > and > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/2494466157 > > > as both are recent edits, I presume that both were added in good faith, > possibly almost in parallel. However, should either of them be here at all? > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/106956 > has > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/266155142/history > > as a member, but that's been "name = Sheffield City Centre" for a couple > of years. > > What's the "correct" way to set up admin boundaries and city centres so > that neither humans nor nominatim are confused? > > Cheers, > Andy > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb One of them is my doing. For some reason, the Sheffield tag had disappeared from the map in recent weeks so it isn't showing the name of the city at certain zoom levels. I assumed it was because someone accidentally deleted the node as I couldn't find it while editing, but also couldn't find the changeset causing the problem to revert. That explains the duplicate then... It's probably worth the node I added being deleted, but the issue with the city name being rendered on the map probably needs looking at as well. -- Andrew Steele <andrew.ste...@gmx.com> _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
