?
--
Lennard
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
sections to
it, and hey presto: that someone has overridden the override.
Don't blame the renderer for bad tagging. You can certainly blame it for
lots of things, but not that.
--
Lennard
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
to their import stages.
Using a key suffix (railway:disused=*) would mean extra work.
Granted, as a maintainer of a few maps, I'm biased. I just detest those
negating tags. This is a $shazbaz. Oh, no, it isn't!
--
Lennard
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk
On 29-10-2010 22:22, thomas van der veen wrote:
Has someone actually done something like this already?
http://maxspeed.openstreetmap.nl/
However, it doesn't cover the UK, and I never had the need to support
mph. But those criteria weren't part of your question. :-)
--
Lennard
to
highway/railway/waterway=* without serious impact to the map. Speak up
if you think this is a bad idea, else this change can go in soon.
--
Lennard
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
to that, because I'd rather not clean up for 3 months
without hints that he/she can/will be stopped by the DWG.
--
Lennard
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
.
--
Lennard
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
them at this time.
PS: Changeset 2329425 seems to still be a clean revert at this point.
--
Lennard
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
of the route.
--
Lennard
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
9 matches
Mail list logo