“ any road that cars can use is also open to cyclists and pedestrians ”
Pedestrians? Are you sure about that? Yes, you can walk along country roads
that lack pavements, but try that in a town and I’m pretty sure you’d get
stopped quite quickly.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 10 Dec 2020, at 15:21, M
Could you not just ask the local mapper to knock on any doors in the street and
ASK them the name?
And then use that local knowledge?
Sent from my iPhone
> On 15 Jul 2020, at 08:36, o...@poppe.dev wrote:
>
>
>> I've made an FOI request yesterday and am awaiting a reply. What we could
>> also
I doubt the point of the exercise in the UK at all. As another mapper has
noted, there are almost no roads unmapped here. Any new developments are
invariably jumped on very quickly by local mappers, as a rare trophy almost!
(Certainly by me)
In which case the number of false positives will be th
And in fact David Earl deserves recognition for pretty much single-handedly
doing the original basic mapping of Cambridge at street level. (I did about 1%
of it at the time, but had the excuse of very young children taking my
attention)
Sent from my iPhone
> On 8 Feb 2020, at 14:30, Richard Fa
And here is the email from the guy who did the original mapping, the last time
this came up, including his reasoning for the amenity Tag rather than building
tag https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2015-May/017457.html
Sent from my iPhone
> On 6 Feb 2020, at 15:49, Brian Prangle
Apart from on motorways!
Sent from my iPhone
> On 2 Oct 2019, at 09:37, Andy Allan wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 05:22, Wulf4096 wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>> in Germany we've got "Radfahrstreifen" (solid line) which are
>> additionally marked by bicycle signs. Only cyclists may use those, and
>
Not sure how to tag it now, but are you sure the name is correct? JW’s place of
worship has always been known as a Kingdom Hall, not Wisdom.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_Hall
Sent from my iPhone
> On 23 May 2019, at 21:37, Mark Goodge wrote:
>
> Looking for some advice...
>
> There
That’s parkland, surely?
Sent from my iPhone
On 16 Mar 2019, at 14:32, Martin Wynne wrote:
>> To me the simplest rule of thumb
>> is that a park is fenced, allowing the authorities to control access, while
>> a common is unfenced allowing anyone to access it at any time.
>
> The local municipa
Actually, it doesn’t work on a phone Browser. (iOS, Safari)
Sent from my iPhone
> On 20 Dec 2017, at 10:11, Paul Berry wrote:
>
> David,
>
> Happily, nothing sinister. It's a url forwarder/shortener used by Twitter.
> Will work on a phone browser, but may be blocked by desktop browsers.
>
>
Looks like a game.
> On 16 Mar 2017, at 15:27, Matt Williams wrote:
>
> I've just seen some very strange edits from the user
> ExperimentalNarratives showing up in Coventry:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ExperimentalNarratives/history
>
> I'm not sure whether the change itself makes sense
+1 for simplifying name. Adding the name of 'sponsor of the week' adds nothing
to the utility of the map, and just means extra work for no benefit. We are
under no obligation to promote the sponsor.
> On 18 Feb 2017, at 12:43, Philip Barnes wrote:
>
> I see no problem with this edit, however
Can the written description be used as a source?
> On 17 Aug 2016, at 19:57, Andy Townsend wrote:
>
>> On 17/08/2016 16:42, jc...@mail.com wrote:
>> As a result much of what has been added is inaccurate, not least because
>> many nodes are shared with highways etc. despite the written descripti
Cambridge appears to be Summer 2011, sadly.
> On 27 Apr 2016, at 14:40, Andy Robinson wrote:
>
> Mapbox imagery for the area around me in north brum is I think from 2014.
> It’s a little more recent than BING but not buy more than a few months and
> the resolution is poorer.
>
> Cheers
> And
Cambridge looks to be approximately five years old imagery (Queen Emma School
still under construction - opened Sept 2011)
Phil
> On 26 Apr 2016, at 23:14, Malcolm Herring
> wrote:
>
>> On 26/04/2016 20:08, Rob Nickerson wrote:
>> Worth checking your local area:
>
> Looking at their images o
ta, and
> should be picked up in the next update. This will mean there will likely be a
> little jump in the numbers of unnamed roads. (Sorry for the delay in
> updating, I’ve been on paternity leave this past couple of weeks.)
>
> Shaun
> Developer
> ITO World
>
>>
I'm slightly confused - I fixed a lot /most of Cambridge with not:name a year
or two ago but on looking again, find the same errors still there. How do I get
ITO to refresh this? The site says it was refreshed today.
> On 11 Dec 2015, at 17:44, Jez Nicholson wrote:
>
> Thank you. You've prompt
I'm on a train in East Anglia at the moment and the signs next to the track
still appear to be miles per hour.
> On 5 Sep 2015, at 09:18, Dave F. wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> A user has been converting the maxspeed tag of railway line from mph to kph:
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278060675/hi
ndy Mabbett wrote:
>> I passed there again recently, on a coach, so had a better view; it
>> looks like a natural cliff rather than recent digging.
>>
>> On 4 September 2014 at 10:14, Phillip Barnett
>> wrote:
>>> I drive past there occasionally - I don’t reca
I'm a Cambridge mapper, but I'd advise doing nothing until you've spoken with
David Earl who was contracted by Cambridge University to actually map the
university - see this link
http://soc2012.soc.org.uk/node/16.html
Thanks
> On 21 May 2015, at 22:39, Dan S wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I don't r
Yes, round here in Cambridge too! At least my local box now has a last
collection at 9am - which rather caught me out when I was trying to catch the
former 17:30 last post
> On 26 Mar 2015, at 11:46, John Aldridge wrote:
>
>> On 26/03/2015 10:20, Stuart Reynolds wrote:
>> Collection time
d not make your
neighbour aware of this fact, then yes, you most likely would be liable.
> On 28 Jan 2015, at 14:24, Pmailkeey . wrote:
>
> A 10 year old who buys cigarettes might conceivably accidentally smoke them.
>
> On 28 January 2015 at 14:21, Phillip Barnett
> wrot
That's because Companies House are the official legal arbiters of who is, or is
not, a legally trading company and thus have the ultimate responsibility.
> On 28 Jan 2015, at 14:44, Steve Doerr wrote:
>
> On 28/01/2015 01:13, Neil Matthews wrote:
> [snip]
>
> I guess we might need to be a li
So all shopkeepers are liable if they sell a hedge trimmer to someone who then
cuts off their fingers? I would be very surprised if that was the case
> On 28 Jan 2015, at 13:52, Pmailkeey . wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 28 January 2015 at 12:10, Ed Loach wrote:
>> > On 28/01/2015 01:13, Neil Matt
I drive past there occasionally - I don’t recall a quarry next to the A14. Do
you mean the Cranford Landfill site, which is further back, and I have now
added from Bing imagery. Might look like a quarry on a drive past?
Phil
On 3 Sep 2014, at 18:01, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> Do we have anyone near
24 matches
Mail list logo