Again, the max weight is not the same as the max allowable weight. Using
maxweight in this context is wrong.
See the Key:hgv wiki page where I added an explanation and examples.
Am 27. September 2018 11:25:11 MESZ schrieb Ed Loach :
>Tobias asked:
>
>> In United Kingdom, how do you tag roads
if the proposal is unchanged)
Greetings
Tobias
On 26/09/2018 13:35, Tobias Zwick wrote:
> Hey there
>
> I can't believe this didn't come up before - or maybe it did but was not
> documented in the wiki.
>
> In United Kingdom, how do you tag roads signed with
Hey there
I can't believe this didn't come up before - or maybe it did but was not
documented in the wiki.
In United Kingdom, how do you tag roads signed with this sign?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UK_traffic_sign_622.1A.svg
Note that the GVM for which the sign applies is given
Hey Phil
The quest pin is still in your application's cache. The app downloaded
the quest more than 8 months ago.
In any case, no need to worry. In case you solve a quest that turns out
to be outdated (=there is a conflict with actual data), it will discard
that answer and invalidate the cache of
Also,
6. Did you come up with the term "restricted" or is the term actually
used within the same context as single / dual carriageway in the UK
legislation? Because, that term is usually used for quite another thing
in OSM context (restricted access roads). But, as long as the nsl_*
taggings in
200, Tobias Zwick wrote:
>> Does the "there are no repeater signs" rule only apply for the
>> default
>> 30 mph limit (and the 20 mph zones)? Or in other words, if there is
>> an
>> explicit different limit posted, let's say 40 mph, does it have to be
>
35, Philip Barnes wrote:
>
>
> On 1 May 2018 10:41:28 BST, Tobias Zwick <o...@westnordost.de> wrote:
>
>> This is where I need your help. How should the dialog be changed (in
>> GB)
>> to not create any misunderstandings here?
>>
> Difficult withou
eople who seem not to notice
> changeset comments.
>
> On 01/05/18 10:41, Tobias Zwick wrote:
>> I am quite sure that this problem can lead to wrong tagging,
>> specifically that normal urban roads, even residential ones, are tagged
>> with "maxspeed:type=nsl_single" w
cause that's what
> the sign says. There is nothing special about these areas.
>
> Phil (trigpoint)
>
>
> On 1 May 2018 09:58:23 BST, Tobias Zwick <o...@westnordost.de> wrote:
>
> Regarding the 20mph zones
> (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/30_km/h_zone
in Britain, it is not enough to tell the user to
look for a sign at the start of the road, but to, well, what exactly?
This is where I need your help. How should the dialog be changed (in GB)
to not create any misunderstandings here?
Tobias
On 30/04/2018 19:41, Tobias Zwick wrote:
> Hi there
t can be split at the appropriate points.
>
> Phil (trigpoint)
>
>
> On 30 April 2018 18:41:26 BST, Tobias Zwick <o...@westnordost.de> wrote:
>
> Hi there
>
> On tagging implicit speed limits in the United Kingdom, the wiki lists
> the foll
areas can be 40 mph and increasingly speed limits are
> being reduced to 20mph in built up areas
>
> Regards
>
> Brian
>
> On 30 April 2018 at 18:41, Tobias Zwick <o...@westnordost.de
> <mailto:o...@westnordost.de>> wrote:
>
> Hi there
>
>
Hi there
On tagging implicit speed limits in the United Kingdom, the wiki lists
the following values [1] for "maxspeed:type":
GB:nsl_single (=60 mph), GB:nsl_dual (=70 mph) and GB:motorway (=70 mph)
I understand that the current legislation defines a road with
road-lighting as a built-up area
13 matches
Mail list logo
