WARNING: CHECK YOUR BOUNDARIES!
Longbow4u has been causing other problems with these edits as well. In
Kent the boundaries of Ashford and Shepway districts have been emptied
of ways. The addition of wikipedia links is continuing apace, sometimes
in English, sometimes in German.
This changese
On 22/10/2012 09:36, Matt Williams wrote:
On 21 October 2012 23:53, Philip Barnes wrote:
What is the
language code for Anglo-Saxon?
'ang' (ISO 639-2)
And they do have a Wikipedia:
http://ang.wikipedia.org/wiki/H%C4%93afods%C4%ABde
--
Steve
___
T
On 21 October 2012 23:13, SomeoneElse wrote:
> Personally, I'd say that if the process requires the duplication of
> exactly the same value as is already in "name" that the process is flawed...
I think it can be useful because the article name isn't always just the OSM
object's "name" value. Le
On 21 October 2012 23:53, Philip Barnes wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 23:13 +0100, SomeoneElse wrote:
>> Robert Norris wrote:
>> > But I still think it would be better to put wikipedia=en:ENGLISH_NAME for
>> > places in England.
>> >
>> Personally, I'd say that if the process requires the duplic
On 21 October 2012 16:08, Robert Norris wrote:
>
>
> to add a tags such as "wikipedia = de:Portsmouth"
>
> One can't help but wonder what the point of such tags are (an indeed
> website), as any intelligent web search based on the name of the object
> (and +wikipedia) and maybe UK or the county wi
On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 23:13 +0100, SomeoneElse wrote:
> Robert Norris wrote:
> > But I still think it would be better to put wikipedia=en:ENGLISH_NAME for
> > places in England.
> >
> Personally, I'd say that if the process requires the duplication of
> exactly the same value as is already in "na
Robert Norris wrote:
But I still think it would be better to put wikipedia=en:ENGLISH_NAME for
places in England.
Personally, I'd say that if the process requires the duplication of
exactly the same value as is already in "name" that the process is flawed...
Cheers,
Andy
__
"because of the WIWOSM feature in Wikipedia. By adding one link to a
Wikipedia-Article (which language is not important) on the relation of
an administrative district, the area will be marked in the maps of some
wikipedias (de, it, es etc (however, not yet en)) as a field. Find more
informat
> Looks bonkers to me. Have you tried sending them a polite message
> asking them what what the purpose of the links are that they're adding?
>
It was quite succinct, so maybe not that polite.
___
Talk-GB
I am baffled by this one
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/13567143, amongst many others.
Anyone able to ask why in a politely worded German email?
Phil
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 21/10/2012 16:33 SomeoneElse wrote:
On 21/10/2012 16:08, Robert Norris wrote:
> http://www.openst
On 21/10/2012 16:08, Robert Norris wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Longbow4u/edits
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/13577963
to add a tags such as "wikipedia = de:Portsmouth"
Looks bonkers to me. Have you tried sending them a polite message
asking them what what the pu
Seeing these edits:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Longbow4u/edits
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/13577963
to add a tags such as "wikipedia = de:Portsmouth"
One can't help but wonder what the point of such tags are (an indeed website),
as any intelligent web search based on
12 matches
Mail list logo
