On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 04:23:56PM +0100, Brian Prangle wrote:
> why not just tag a node on the road where the sign is as maxweight? It's
> much simpler and reflects what's on the ground
Apologies: I rejected your suggestion too quickly.
If instead of maxweight, I use maxweight:forward = 7.5 on a
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 08:57:24AM +0100, Nick Allen wrote:
> Hi
>
> Before you map it I would check around a little as this situation is very
> unusual. Weight restrictions are only used to protect something such as a
> culvert, bridge, or other underground vulnerable object. If the
> authorit
On 14 October 2013 13:24, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) <
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The note is great for humans, but won't be able to be interpreted by
> routing algorithms. Using the "Conditional Restrictions" from
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions , I'd
On 12/10/2013 21:00, Philip Barnes wrote:
I came across an odd situation where a road is on way, except for cycles
and vehicles over 13'3" high. Its a residential area of Shrewsbury which
would be a useful rat run, hence the oneway. But to make it complicated,
there is are industrial units, and a
On 12 October 2013 21:00, Philip Barnes wrote:
> I came across an odd situation where a road is on way, except for cycles
> and vehicles over 13'3" high. Its a residential area of Shrewsbury which
> would be a useful rat run, hence the oneway. But to make it complicated,
> there is are industrial
The oneway except cyclists bit is a well defined thing, whereby you can use the
tag cycleway=opposite. You can be more specific by saying opposite_lane, or
opposite_track as appropriate. (There are other way to tag the same thing which
may be appropriate).
Shaun
On 12 Oct 2013, at 21:00, Phili
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 04:23:56PM +0100, Brian Prangle wrote:
> why not just tag a node on the road where the sign is as maxweight? It's
> much simpler and reflects what's on the ground
>
Because the signs can only be seen from one direction. A single node
maxweight would suggest that overweight
why not just tag a node on the road where the sign is as maxweight? It's
much simpler and reflects what's on the ground
Regards
Brian
On 13 October 2013 12:28, ael wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 09:00:38PM +0100, Philip Barnes wrote:
> > I came across an odd situation where a road is on way
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 09:00:38PM +0100, Philip Barnes wrote:
> I came across an odd situation where a road is on way, except for cycles
> and vehicles over 13'3" high. Its a residential area of Shrewsbury which
> would be a useful rat run, hence the oneway. But to make it complicated,
> there is
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 08:11:41PM +0100, Ed Loach wrote:
> ael wrote:
>
> > I have a road with a maxweight (7.5t) sign at one end but none at
> the
> > other end. So I take it that this means that vehicles over this
> weight
> > may not enter from that end.
> >
> > I have used a relation tagged
I came across an odd situation where a road is on way, except for cycles
and vehicles over 13'3" high. Its a residential area of Shrewsbury which
would be a useful rat run, hence the oneway. But to make it complicated,
there is are industrial units, and a low bridge.
Not sure of a better way, but
ael wrote:
> I have a road with a maxweight (7.5t) sign at one end but none at
the
> other end. So I take it that this means that vehicles over this
weight
> may not enter from that end.
>
> I have used relation tagged with
> type=restriction:maxweight
> maxweight = 7.5
> restriction = no_entry
>
Maybe this should be a question for the tagging list, but I am not
quite sure how to map a maxweight turning restriction.
I have a road with a maxweight (7.5t) sign at one end but none at the
other end. So I take it that this means that vehicles over this weight
may not enter from that end.
I hav
13 matches
Mail list logo
