Thanks all. For now I’ve taken the simple approach of adding a couple of small
links from the footpath to the roads, as Rob suggests.
Stuart
On 1 Dec 2014, at 17:38, Rob Nickerson
mailto:rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I would map to the first dropped kerb and join back to the road. I would
I would map to the first dropped kerb and join back to the road. I would
leave what's there but add a link to the road (perhaps at the exit road of
the station).
Rob
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listi
On 2014-12-01 13:57, Richard Mann wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:22 PM, SomeoneElse mailto:li...@atownsend.org.uk>> wrote:
Usage of adjacent seems to be fairly localised in the UK:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/6k7
Yeah, probably just me (maybe nobody else feels the need to make the
dis
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:22 PM, SomeoneElse wrote:
>
> Usage of adjacent seems to be fairly localised in the UK:
>
> http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/6k7
>
> Yeah, probably just me (maybe nobody else feels the need to make the
distinction). I think there are some places in Germany where they have
sepa
On 01/12/2014 11:58, John Aldridge wrote:
On 01/12/2014 11:39, Stuart Reynolds wrote:
Looking for some advice in Bletchley, specifically, but to answer a
more general point about footpaths.
:
So what is the guidance here? Ought the road have a distinct footpath
both sides? Or not footpath, an
On 01/12/14 11:39, Stuart Reynolds wrote:
road, which is Sherwood Drive. There is also a footpath shown coming
from the station and along the eastern side of Sherwood Drive, but not
on the western side.
I think it can be difficult to justify undoing micro-mappings, like
this, even though they
On Mon, 1 Dec 2014 11:39:48 +
Stuart Reynolds wrote:
> My inclination would be to rip out the footpath and rely on the
> sidewalk tag, except that seems extreme and it isn’t wrong per se.
I'd say that it is wrong on the basis that it implies that you may only
cross where the path shares a no
On 01/12/2014 11:39, Stuart Reynolds wrote:
Looking for some advice in Bletchley, specifically, but to answer a more
general point about footpaths.
:
So what is the guidance here? Ought the road have a distinct footpath both
sides? Or not footpath, and use the tags on the road, or just conne
My inclination is to draw them in (just on main roads for the moment) but I
add an adjacent=yes tag so that there's a basic flag that they're part of a
bigger street structure.
I started to do this when I wanted to mark crossings as linear features,
rather than just as dots.
Richard
On Mon, Dec
Looking for some advice in Bletchley, specifically, but to answer a more
general point about footpaths.
Please look at http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/51.99530/-0.73751
Bletchley Rail Station sits in the middle, and to the west is the main road,
which is Sherwood Drive. There is also a foo
10 matches
Mail list logo
