Re: [Talk-GB] Cambridge reversion needed

2009-08-10 Thread Shaun McDonald
On 10 Aug 2009, at 18:51, David Earl wrote: David Earl wrote: Ito OSM Mapper has reported no changes in Cambridge since 3/8, otherwise I'd have spotted this sooner. In fact, I've got no sessions recorded for any of the areas I'm monitoring since 4/8 - Peter, do you know why? The reason

Re: [Talk-GB] Cambridge reversion needed

2009-08-10 Thread David Earl
David Earl wrote: > I'll wrote to him/her. Doh, my typing. 'write', of course. I've also added a feed on their edits so I can keep an eye on them. Fortunately these were largely isolated nodes, and no one had touched them in the meantime. Ito OSM Mapper has reported no changes in Cambridge sin

Re: [Talk-GB] Cambridge reversion needed

2009-08-10 Thread David Earl
oun...@openstreetmap.org] *On Behalf Of *Barnett, Phillip > *Sent:* 10 August 2009 17:52 > *To:* Talk GB > *Subject:* [Talk-GB] Cambridge reversion needed > > > > There appears to be some accidental damage in Cambridge – a whole bunch > of tea rooms etc have moved into t

Re: [Talk-GB] Cambridge reversion needed

2009-08-10 Thread Barnett, Phillip
Make that location Coe Fen, not The Backs, sorry. From: talk-gb-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-gb-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Barnett, Phillip Sent: 10 August 2009 17:52 To: Talk GB Subject: [Talk-GB] Cambridge reversion needed There appears

[Talk-GB] Cambridge reversion needed

2009-08-10 Thread Barnett, Phillip
There appears to be some accidental damage in Cambridge - a whole bunch of tea rooms etc have moved into the Backs ( open marshy green spaces to the West of the town. All appear to be from the same changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2049927 created by a new user, AliP, who