On 05/09/2019 09:47, Jez Nicholson wrote: It would seem ridiculous
for me to have to set up an account and> licence the underlying section
of map to sell a single field But what> if I'm selling 15,000
fields?? etc., etc.
Field boundaries don't change much over the years. If you use an
5 Sep 2019, 00:40 by bainton@gmail.com:
> Out of interest, is OS's position on derived data clearly the correct one
> legally speaking? I note the wiki talks in terms of OS 'claiming' IP in the
> derived data, not that it actually *is* their IP, so I wondered.
>
As far as copyright goes,
As far as I know Ordnance Survey's theory of derived data has never been
tested in court. However there's an upcoming High Court decision (arising
from a dispute between 77M Ltd and OS) that might shed some light.
On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 at 23:42, Edward Bainton wrote:
The idea of asking a ranger
The idea of asking a ranger to trace the boundary (on a printout of a
thoroughly detailed OSM, of course: better get to work...) is a great one.
iirc, the boundaries are all pretty major geographical features, so
hopefully fairly easy. But yes, Jez, what a faff.
Out of interest, is OS's position
4 matches
Mail list logo
